November 24, 2024
NYUGrad introduced his subscribers and me to NotebookLM, a Google AI technology that “helps you understand complex information by summarizing facts, explaining ideas, and brainstorming connections.” It offers many features but one of the impressive ones is that it auto-generates a podcast from text files.
You may find this podcast to be as awesome as I did:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EfTRsunERmlX8up9pkOueWETMR6G3fCQ/view
The backstory was presented by NYUGrad to his subscribers today.
With the U.S holiday week and no doubt a slow down of career and acceleration of consumerism this week, I wanted to pay homage to a mentor while providing a fascinating look into his wisdom from 2007, when everyone was still drinking the Kool-aid. The euphoria was very similar to today.
I hope you enjoy this conversation on your holiday travels. It is avail to listen offline on major platforms. You can even download the episode here on Substack as well. Click the three dots to the right of the play button to download mp3.
I have written about Bill Cara here many times. I learned quite a lot from this Wizard over a few decades. You can read more about him and his storied career here: https://billcara.com/about
As you know I have this new toy/tool called NotebookLM and I wanted to experiment by applying it to 169 lessons, or “gems” by Bill Cara from 2007, right before the doo doo hit the fan in financial markets.
One of Bill’s readers named Kyle compiled these 169 gems over six months from March 1, 2007 to August 23, 2007.
How prescient, as The Dow 30 reached a high of 14,198 in Oct 2007 and plummeted to a low of 7,033 in Feb 2009.
Now you can listen to AI summarize the 169 gems for you in a podcast format while you drive, ride the train, or fly this holiday week.
Here are the custom instructions I gave the NotebookLM software along with the source material:
Source: “Blast from the Past”
– Of the 169 Gems from the source Bill Cara, find the most repeated themes and summarize into relevant subject groups that are cohesive
– The audience is intermediate to advanced
– two hosts discussion
– Compare and contrast Bill Cara’s subjects, warnings, and insights to what actually happened in the financial markets from 2008 to even today
Disclaimer: This podcast was created by Alphabet and their NotebooksLM AI software. The output may or may not be 100% accurate in citing the source material. This AI technology is new and please use as entertainment and a starting point for your own research. At the very least it can help us use our imaginations to see how this new technology will impact us in our lives in the near future.
The ”Gems”
#1
The point really is that global markets do not operate in a vacuum. Prices are not random. They are pushed and pulled by economic and financial forces. Sometimes we discover later what those forces are. In the meantime, we just have to watch those prices.
And that is precisely why I believe that Relative Strength Index (RSI) is the most important technical indicator available to traders. You see, RSI helps me assess when prices are very high and when they are very low. I believe in the practice of selling high and buying low. Over the years, I found that’s a practice that has never failed me.
But this is also the phase of the price cycle I call the Distribution Zone, which is another word for “extremely over-bought”. That doesn’t mean that it’s time to sell. No, you ought to be looking for a break-down in that pattern. For me (based on a trading time horizon I feel comfortable with), I look for the time when the RSI-7 on the Hourly and Daily then falls below the 70-line and, if so, I look to see how close the Weekly RSI-7 data is crossing back below the 70-line. If it’s close I probably sell.
But I seldom look at a single stock to make any decision. It’s true that the concept of a “broken” company or a “broken” stock occurs at times, but typically the price of stocks move up and down in groups. That’s because traders buy and sell ETF’s, or mutual fund managers tend to buy industry ideas or traders generally play follow the leader. So I look at the market by group, and when I see the RSI-7 going above the 70-line for several or all stocks in the group, and then the RSI-7 falls back below 70, I believe that a sell-off has started.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 1, 2007
#2
These are tense times in global stock markets. Increasingly the quants are crowding out the rest of us with their programmed trading that is causing temporary but extreme fluctuations between futures and cash markets. But at the end of the day, remember, the (intermediate-term) trend is your friend.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 1, 2007
#3
And loans will be called because too many debtors cannot make the loan payments. That’s called debt service, and when it becomes a problem, the banks start calling loans. That’s when things like houses and automobiles and stocks and mutual funds have to get sold in order to pay back the banker.
This might not seem fair, but it is. And every few years, we go through this cycle. As long as we live in a credit-based, sell-side directed society, we always will. What the central bankers of the world need to do now is to rebalance their currencies so that international trade and commerce and cross-border investment can be optimized.
#4
The problem is that academic literature has its place. How many students of the market have learned as much in the classroom as they have in this blog, and blogs like mine? I’ll tell you, there isn’t a week go by that I don’t receive letters from students at prestigious universities wondering why they are paying tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn stuff they are soon going to have to forget because it is useless or flat out wrong.
I may not have all the answers, but I know fraud when I see it, and I see a lot of fraudulent literature taught in business schools today.
#5
So, what I am saying is try not to get pulled into the crowd heading to the exits this morning. Hang back; you are starting to see real fear – the whites of the seller’s eyes – so that means you have to have your finger close to the “Buy” button. That’s not to say you are going to buy stocks today; but, you need to prepare yourself psychologically to do something that doesn’t come natural. You have to stand on the railroad track, knowing those lights are an oncoming train. Maybe you step off, but maybe the train comes to a halt, and reverses. You must focus – not panic — at times like this. Discipline my friends is absolutely necessary to be a successful trader.
#6
The problem is that you never know when a small pull-back (ie, secondary or tertiary wave correction) turns into a big one (ie, a primary correction known as a major Bear).
#7
Readers often ask if my prognostications are intuitive, and while I may not be able to explain them in academic detail, there is a basis for everything I do. At the end of the day, I refer to the market as a dance. And when prices don’t flow naturally, you start looking for reasons. Often the driver is Fed intervention or some other form of manipulation. And when I see situations that I sense are being manipulated (and they frequently are), and I’m a participant (obviously on the outside), I just throw my hands in the air and shout, “I’m out.”
#8
We learn a lot through our failures. Among many other things, we learn to trade less frequently; to consider risk ahead of reward; to take smaller average positions; and to cope with losses. But the most important thing I learned is to apply my sense of intellectual curiosity and to trust the price motion more than any other aspect of the market.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 10, 2007
#9
OPM btw is Other People’s Money. I make the reference because there are gunslinging hedge fund managers today who are prepared to take bigger risks in capital markets than Mom & Pop, and some of these funds are gigantic, and when several combine to use the same tactic, I believe they have the financial resources to overwhelm the Fed — at least until trend followers hop on board. And by then Bernanke’s fate would be sealed. What I am saying is that the volatility of markets today is so great that even the Fed is at risk. So the Fed, which uses OPM, and the hedge funds, which use OPM, are in control during this transitioning phase. That’s not a comforting thought for Mom & Pop because it just happens to be their capital being used in the game.
Bill Cara at March 15, 2007
#10
The point I was making today is that (i) biz school has failed miserably in the field of capital markets, and (ii) they run a racket in selling over-priced texts that often are written by profs who “know nothing” (maybe that’s too strong!) about the workings of capital markets. Most of the academic literature — even the Efficient Market stuff written by experts — is debunked every day by professional traders who need to trade successfully for a living. They laugh at that material. The stuff Cramer talks about in the video, unfortunately, is a much more accurate reflection of capital markets. I want you to know the truth so that I can help you. Sometimes I come on too strong in order to get my point across, so, please don’t take it personally.
Posted by: Bill Cara at March 15, 2007
#11
Just remember the expression, “Things are never that good, and they are never that bad.” As we move forward in time, there is a constant reversion to the mean.
Bill Cara on March 17, 2007
#12
The best financed F-1 racecar teams can engineer the best car and hire the best drivers, but winning the race also comes down to having a good “feel” for the car and the track, and avoiding the accidents. That’s why I spend so much time on the Week In Review – every week is a new race, a new track, a different set of weather circumstances, a car that needs to be set up appropriately. At the end of the day, I am trying to get a feel for what it will take me to win the following week’s race.
Bill Cara on March 17, 2007
#13
When it comes to money, I have a simple rule: trust no one but yourself. I learned that rule after spending five years as an independent auditor. Follow the money; ask the questions. Give no one — and I mean no one — the benefit of the doubt. BTW, I am accusing nobody. I’m just pointing to the charts.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on March 21, 2007
#14
Only in America can a distinct negative (ie, a collapsing mortgage financing system and failing housing market) be turned into such a positive. That’s the power of positive thinking — a tribute to America. But it is also testimony that the US authorities are involved in this so-called free market up to their armpits. Alas, I think Charles Dow would turn over in his grave to see such meddling in markets by the US Administration, the Fed, Humungous Bank & Broker and Friends (Private Equity) and Family.
The equity market is not going higher because corporate fundamentals and guidance are pulling it up, but because a very few vested interests are pushing it higher. And they will do it until they can’t do it any longer. But by then they will have rotated their sectors, told their lies, and prepared themselves for the other side of the pendulum’s swing.
For now, being out of the room, out of the deal, you and I have to go along with this stuff. After all, we trade prices. Besides, we are not in a bad position. We have our community to rely on.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 24, 2007
#15
There ought to be a law that when clients get ripped off multi-billions, the guilty party gets to go to jail or at least stopped from trading in securities for a time. Well actually there is a law – one for you and me and a different one for them, the people who run HBB and their friends who make them gazillions in fees and trading profits.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 24, 2007
#16
This story is not about revenue growth or earnings momentum or solid management and so forth. It’s about too many dollars chasing too few high-quality, high-dividend-paying stocks at a time that bonds are in favor because interest rates are artificially too low. This is not news – more like a mea culpa. The real point is that we traders must trade prices. Prices happen for reasons w might not be aware of, or agree with, at the time.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 24, 2007
#17
The point I have consistently made since I started blogging almost three years ago is that markets are not free. Markets are driven by forces that are related to interest rates, economic activity, commodity and forex prices and by vested interests.
Randomness occurs in a vacuum. We don’t live or trade in a vacuum. I have never met a successful veteran trader who suffered from credulity syndrome. In fact, the best of the lot are typically hard-ass skeptics. Rule number 1, 2, 10 and everything in between is, “We trade prices (not stories)”. In other words, success comes to those who don’t care who is operating in a backroom to manipulate prices, just thankful they (whomever they are) do enough to create volatility.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 31, 2007
#18
The problem here is that there is a difference in time horizon. Operations and bookkeeping take forever to roll, whereas the story spinmasters and market prices change as fast as you can blink. If you can just lose that credulity syndrome thing that too many people are afflicted with, then you will see that point.
In other words, when it takes years to cause the balloons to expand and start to burst, a magic solution doesn’t come overnight. Not even when the President, or the Treasury Secretary or the Fed Head or HB&B tell you not to worry, they have all under control. When you have been around the block a few times, like me, you get to recognize the wooden nickels.
Posted by Bill Cara on March 31, 2007
#19
As you know, I happen not to be interested in forecasting price points, which I know from experience is a mug’s game. Our job as traders is to figure out trend direction and to stay on the right side of it.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 4, 2007
#20
Is this the world we want to live in? You know my biggest complaint with capital markets is that the Buy Side faces impossible disadvantages posed by a Sell Side that can act as both principal and agent in the same transaction, where they are permitted to advise us and also trade against our order flow. Until recently that cock-eyed reality being peddled as a level playing field stood above and apart any other complaint I have. I see evidence of more stupidity, more of the “I’m going to get mine” syndrome that affects society today.
Yes, no longer can we trust the independence, objectivity, privacy and confidentiality of our dealings with lawyers. Rather than just being our agents, provided by law an exalted status unlike any other, these lawyers now want to also be principals.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 6, 2007
#21
The average CEO to average worker pay ratio has averaged between 411 and 525 from 2000 to 2005. When I started my career on Bay Street in 1981, that gap was 1/10 as big. I find the situation today unconscionable. And when the CEOs are “getting theirs”, so too are their friends. This stuff will go on until HB&B, private equity, corporate boards, bought-and-paid-for lawyers and judges, and a few thousand cronies are brought to heel. I can’t say when or how, but I see a crisis coming like the one America had in the 1970’s, with stunning worker wage demands, strikes, riots, and so forth. That period, too, was the last time we had stagflation. Think about it.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 7, 2007
#22
Mark my words that only when a list of these private equity and major IPO deals have been completed by HB&B, the Fed/Treasury will then let the equty market to spin in the wind. Not before then. And Treasury rates will not fall until after there is a stock and bond market crash.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 9, 2007
#23
In case you don’t know, in every case of Pump and Dump, there is a Take-Out 3rd party working the marketplace. The record shows that its very often somebody in media. They manage the sting by starting the rumors, or planting the seeds to get the unwary public thinking about the possibilities.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 10, 2007
#24
Remember, when it comes to your money, there are well-connected people out there who will stoop to no depths to try to take it. They simply say, they want theirs and they take it. Here’s another pathetic example that came up yesterday. These people must think that nobody cares, and if caught they are not going to jail anyway.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 10, 2007
#25
The key job of a trader is to stay on the right side of trend. The essential point is to understand that perception is a greater force than reality, so it’s the cyclical phase of the market that is the one for traders to be positioned for. As I have always said, it’s a mugs game to call a secular Bear because nobody knows if it’s going to happen until the reality hits home that it has.
Actually, as you will see if you look closely, it’s a buy-side issue as well as we take note that their paid-for Talking Heads are sent to Financial TV to try to put on a good enough face that maybe their biggest long positions will get hit less than if they are ignored in any panic rush for the exits.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 11, 2007
#26
So what does HB&B do every business cycle when loan losses become an issue? They tighten lending standards and the Little Guy (ie, Mom & Pop) have their homes and cars taken from them. To compensate, HB&B has turned to the component of Friends & Family known as Private Equity to bail them out by taking in loans that add to bank profitability and using those financial resources to buy out companies at cycle-high prices. Who is selling them that paper? Why it’s the prop desks of HB&B of course because those trading profits also look good on the financial summaries and quarterly discussions by management.
With the added risk, of course, the Fed has to tell its owners, ie, HB&B, that interest rates must rise. Stick it to the customer although it’s not the customers’ fault. Make the Little Guy pay for the failed policies of the bankers and the Administration. What’s new? Nothing. Same old, same old. Every few years for all the 40 years I have been in this game.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 11, 2007
#27
When HB&B gets into trouble, watch the Analyst Upgrades. When you see them happening AFTER a stock has run up +20 pct in a month, I’m not so sure it’s a professional analyst calling the shots. It could be the firm’s proprietary trading desk or the corporate finance dept. You never know what goes on behind the closed doors of HB&B. Do these bankers really permit the public access via truly independent and objective auditors or members of the board?
Posted by Bill Cara on April 11, 2007
#28
You know when I first started writing this blog three years ago, I used to receive many letters that suggested I was being too negative as to the amount of “funny” stuff that goes on in markets. But, I continued the mantra, “When it comes to money, people are “funny” – which is another way of saying that greed makes people do bad things. Now, I think all (or most) of you can see the “funny” stuff that goes on. I submit to you that most of this could be stopped quickly, but the SEC and other regulators know that the perps are industry people, as in “made” persons. That makes it harder for the rest of us. But we shall overcome!
Bill Cara on April 13, 2007
#29
When I was a licensed financial advisor in the 1980’s, I must admit to losing my share too on these penny miners. But, in my case it was because I was getting too close to the situation, and I would hold on too long, always hoping for the next successful drill hole or whatever. Later, I discovered that objective and independent thinking always works best. So, no matter what I knew about a company, I learned that trading prices was the most effective approach. And, in the case of the penny stocks, I found that volume was also a crucial piece of information. That’s not to say I would ever ignore good info from experts – as long as there was a distance between my so-called expert and the hype machine that surrounds all companies in the capital raise-up business.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 14, 2007
#30
Yes, people say I have passion and go out on a limb when showing it. But I also know right from wrong, which sadly too many people quickly ignore if, as and when they think they can get away with white-collar theft. If being called “eccentric” is the media response for calling a spade a spade, I’ll proudly accept the moniker.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on April 16, 2007
#31
Every cycle at the very top, promoters of the juniors get absolutely psychotic in their beliefs that the cycle will not end and that they personally have the world-class asset and best story to tell. Typically, from cycle top to bottom, its a drop of -75 pct to over -90 pct for these speculations. So, I advise being extra careful in the final few months as even turkeys will be flying like eagles. The way to best tell is when the news releases become more frequent and more spectacular but the price stalls out amid very heavy volume days.
The biggest gains are made by nimble and reality-based day traders in the final couple months of the stock cycle for these junior miners. Typically, a trader used to trading in and out of a favorite stock over say a quarter or half year will start to do that over a month and then a week and then days and even intra-day periods as markets become even more nervous at the top. Everybody knows the Musical Chairs game; this is it with real money on the line.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 18, 2007
#32
The real point here is that pretty boy Talking Heads on TV may not be experts in capital markets, not even if advertised as so. We The People need to listen to experts, to ground ourselves in reality.
Trading is not an easy task. If it was easy, we’d all incorporate ourselves as a bank and we’d print money whenever we wanted. What makes our job that much harder is that we never know what the Administration, the Treasury and the Fed are up to. Family and Friends at HB&B do. But nobody here ever said that life is fair: there are haves and have-nots for reasons.
One of society’s great disadvantages is that our elected leaders have personal agendas and financial sponsors they are beholden to. So while occasionally we get taken to the cleaners, those insiders will always be getting theirs. Knowledge is power, as they say.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 19, 2007
#33
In the stock market, the name of the game is “Money, Money, Money”. HB&B is trying to line up new money for Advanced Micro Devices before private equity stops listening to the rumors these bankers started.
It’s a tough business when the Fed tells you to print money and nobody shows up to borrow it at Sub-prime rates. So you tell a few stories and start a few rumors to try to get private equity to bite. (If you have been reading this blog for a while, you know the drill.) And if that doesn’t work, HB&B (JPM yesterday and before that LEH) can always start a well-funded corporate share buyback program. If its not one thing, its another. AMD, Google… whatever.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 20, 2007
#34
“Never” is a dangerous word, but I will never, under any circumstances, respect the decisions of the present leadership of these two countries, or Great Britain, to send our sons and daughters to their death under impossible circumstances as they are doing in Afghanistan and Iraq today. After many difficult years, hoping beyond hope, I finally say ‘Enough is Enough’.
As a capital markets trader, at the beginning of January I sat back to assess the worsening big picture. What I saw was a situation in the Middle East that had become doomed to failure and a political leadership that had lost its moral compass. I concluded that these people – Bush, Blair, Harper, Cheney, Rove, Libby, US Attorney General Gonzales, and the rest, would lie to any extent and take whatever extreme action they deemed necessary, to mislead The People in the hope we would continue to serve the vested interests of their financial supporters. Having totally and utterly failed the people they were elected to represent, they decided to turn over the mess to Goldman Sachs insiders. What a mess they have put the world in.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 20, 2007
#35
What specific driver will ultimately push a major trend reversal in capital markets, I cannot say. However, the credit bubble will definitely pop. In the following months and years, there will be failures of local governments, small and mid-sized banks, housing and mortgage companies, as well as the related service industry (some lawyers, accountants and real estate brokers included) in the US. Unemployment will rise, etc. The hundreds of thousands of returning solders (Middle East and elsewhere) will make for worse unemployment.
I now believe this will be a gradual process of economic and capital market breakdown, something like 1973 and 1974, which just happens to be the poster child for Stagflation. Only this cycle will be worse, in my opinion. Whether or not we are headed for a period to be defined as Depression is something I will leave to people like Nouriel Roubini to argue. I am, however, concerned.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 21, 2007
#36
Government has decided to help their Friends in high places (ie, HB&B and gnomes) “save” the bankrupt mortgage and housing industry. The cost will now be shifted to future generations just like a 20-year home mortgage recently became a 40-year mortgage.
This is no longer a matter of sticking it to your children. Its your grandchildren who will be paying for these miscreants in Washington and their VIP patrons whose greed knows no bounds, it seems. When they want it, tomorrow cannot be soon enough; but when they have to pay it back, why not leave the bill to our kids and their kids, as the logic goes.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 21, 2007
#37
For what it’s worth, I believe (i) there is always an element of truth or believability to a con man or magician’s presentation (ii) the public gets sucked into believing these stories because of hope and greed factors, and (iii) all companies are working hard to create shareholder value, but it is the Wall Street sales machine that makes some of them appear better than others — until of course the storytellers want to move on to a new story (whereupon they dump their inventory positions to free up cash for the next play), not caring who gets left holding the bag. The so-called financial services business is a brutal one. There is no place for traders who are afflicted with credulity syndrome.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 21, 2007
#38
At the end of the day, you will come to see you are not investing (in products or companies), but you are trading prices, and that your motivation is to increase your financial wealth and lower your risk. You will look at trading as a process, a journey which has a right road and a wrong one, and with a few skills, some experience and a bit of determination you can make it on your own, and that you should make every possible effort to do it on your own. It is after all your capital.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 21, 2007
#39
There is obviously no protecting your wealth when white-collar thieves are permitted by the securities regulators and courts to do their nasty work, as I proved in the case of Stelco. You take a company in 100 pct compliance with its financial obligations, in its most profitable year in its history, and you bankrupt it in order to eliminate the rights of bondholders and shareholders, inject a couple hundred million new equity to replace the couple hundred million in lawyers and re-org managers’ fees, and voila: the same billion dollar corporation that existed previously — except you own 100 pct of the new stock. Nice work if you can get away with it.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 24, 2007
#40
You need a plan and to stick to that plan. And I say you need to be patient and let markets come to you. If you want to play tennis with a pro, the only way to win is being on the defensive and hope the opponent makes unforced errors. You are trading against market pros (HB&B) and yet you can’t wait to go on the offensive. That doesn’t make sense. The object of the game is to win.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 24, 2007
#41
Somewhere along the way, I discovered that there is only one happiness we can achieve in life and that is to help others, not to take from them. I learned enough in the boardrooms of HB&B, however, to see that most of those people were not adding value, not building friendships, not helping people, regardless of anything they said.
I have been fortunate not to have been subjected to the unfairness of private equity groups working in co-operation with lawyers and judges, bankers and others hoping to “get theirs”, which means, of course, to take wealth from others. I feel sorry for the steelworkers, the bondholders and shareholders, and the people of Hamilton who have lost so much to those Barbarians. It didn’t have to be that way. It doesn’t have to be that way.
What we need are thousands of people like me working in a virtual network who can independently and objectively bring these kind of situations out into the sunlight. We need people to get angry when their capital is stolen, and we need lawsuits to hold up the scoundrels from a free ride to riches.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 24, 2007
#42
Another one of the market’s unpleasant excesses is centered on the “I will get mine” mantra of corporate managers who, rather than face expulsion by a predator investor, are committing to share buy-backs at a far greater pace than the free cash flow of their companies would possibly allow. So their friendly loan officer at HB&B is opening a window with a smile, and these companies are using the money to restructure their balance sheet.
The problem is that smiling HB&B loan officer is a two-faced snake who is pushing private equity to become corporate predators by easy loans there too. So the market has become a vicious cycle, controlled yet again by HB&B. The sad part is that the HB&B analysts seem to have become more keen on “Mo” (as in price momentum) than actually telling their clients that wealth is not being created as fast as debt, and that is a recipe for disaster.
All through the piece, from Liar Loans to be able to buy houses to HB&B lending for M&A and share buy-backs, there is a common factor underlying the problems with this market: debt and the world’s inability to meet the debt service HB&B will demand when interest rates rise above current levels. I feel like someone watching the members of AA take a swig from their bottles as they enter the meeting. There is a sickness here, but nothing I (or you) could say will change the situation. Only a monster Bear market will change the course of history.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 25, 2007
#43
And we were taught to believe that money didn’t come from trees. How wrong our parents were. And their parents. Paper comes from trees! Millions, billions, trillions. Do people really understand these terms or do they merely take them for words – with no debt attached. Can somebody really print an asset with no debt attached?
You see, unless you discover gold, you cannot print money by itself. There is always debt on the other side of the bookkeeper’s ledger.Now, in time, that asset might grow, or it might decline. It might even disappear. But HB&B will go to the highest court of the land to ensure the offsetting debt does not diminish. We all know that, don’t we?
Posted by Bill Cara on April 26, 2007
#44
Markets don’t move randomly; they are pushed by sell-side institutional account managers selling themes. The theme this week was how the lower $USD and the share buy-backs would boost the US exporter conglomerates. But maybe there was more to the story than that. Maybe these mega-cap concerns are now into proprietary trading rooms that deal in the currency plays? After all, their operating cash flow and profitability is materially affected by currency swings over which they have no control.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#45
Without war, which is decided by governments, there would never be an inflation problem. If you doubt that statement, simply look at a 250 year chart of inflation and in every case you will link the cycle to a war. Outside of wartime, increased productivity and intellectual property discoveries is a killer of cost and a creator of wealth.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#46
Now that HB&B gets a chance (the legal right) to see our order flow and our portfolios and financial resources, and trades against us, they dropped our commission cost of trading to pennies, hoping we would trade even more. They would even pay us commissions to trade if we would trade more! With that “unfair advantage” of proprietary trading against client order flow, how can they lose. (HB&B speaking:) “Let’s see; I know I can clip this client for $2 a share, so why not pay him 2 cents commission? You think I josh? (Cara shakes head from side to side)
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#47
Remember, these big guys are no longer mining companies. Xstrata, for example, is a market trader. They buy management control in order to play the resource market. They hire great professional managers, but their head office people wouldn’t recognize a shaft unless they are sticking it to somebody.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#48
I think by now you get it. The price of assets can be lifted by the creation of wealth or by speculative means. One or the other. The latter is defined (by me in this case) as a ton of debt creating an ounce of wealth and also higher asset prices. This gives new meaning to the expression “lead balloon”.
There is another popular expression in equity markets, which is that “what goes up will come down”. I’m here to say that most of the time that’s really not true. It just happens to be true today — because higher prices today are the clear result of speculation, which in turn has been caused by excessive money printing by the world’s central banks. First it was real estate that has taken the hit; next it will be stocks and bonds.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#49
Knowing that MBA-PhD’s and CFA’s on Wall Street haven’t grasped what primary school kids are taught, I have this theory that we’re all born as smart people at the end of our lives, and we regress over the years back to birth in the womb.
With age on my side, as it were, I’m smart and I’m just getting started. Unfortunately too many of you have been dummied down in your youth to the point where you believe that (well you know) is the best place to end up. Now, listen up to an old guy. When the ‘x debt versus the .67x asset’ thing happens to some people in real estate, especially those of the LIAR LOAN group, they tend to walk away or declare financial bankruptcy. Of course, in that case, the present US Administration saw it coming and managed to squeeze in new bankruptcy laws before the event.
Posted by Bill Cara on April 28, 2007
#50
Recall my words in a recent WIR, trading is hard. I like to say that if trading was easy, where we just sat around hitting the ‘easy’ button to make money, there would be no farmers, steelworkers and factory workers doing the real work. Trading successfully is a life skill that has to be developed over time. Some people pick it up quickly and others do not. However, I think the harder you work at it, the quicker success will come to you. And once you reach a point where you think you know it all, you realize there is more to learn.
I never stop learning, and I think all of you will agree that I work pretty hard at it. By my showing you how much commitment I have, I hope that I am setting an example to younger people. Yes, if you love trading as I do, this isn’t work, but it is commitment.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 1, 2007
#51
Most of us want to try to do too much. It’s a natural trait. But if we relax, and let the market take the lead, some of us ought to choose a slow dance and let others try something faster. It’s difficult days like these where traders can learn the most. When Bull markets are moving fast, even turkeys fly like eagles. Everybody thinks they are an eagle, but deep down we all know the truth.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 1, 2007
#52
The first Friday of every month, the capital markets (ie, stocks and bonds) are put through their biggest spin cycle of the month. It’s called US Jobs Report Friday. Like CPI, the number is almost meaningless because it is a wild estimate and will almost certainly be revised. What the Jobs data does, however, is to add grist to the sell-side mill. Just a lot more yada yada by smooth talking noggins, trying to convince Joe Public they are “experts” and you ought to be following their advice.
I learned the patter too. I mean, if you want to survive in the securities industry in any capacity from chief investment strategist to mail runner there are a few things you must be prepared to utter when your lips start moving. The US Jobs Report data is at the top of the list. CPI is another. Why? Because all people have a vested interest in their jobs and in the cost of getting to the end of the month, hoping to not be a dollar short.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 4, 2007
#53
Because the playing field never changes, ie, HB&B tilts their casino in their favor so they can sweep the Street daily, sometimes hourly, the rest of us have to learn how to fight like guerrillas. We have to strike at a moment’s notice – before those HB&B computers can smash and grab.
What comes of this of course is something now referred to in the negative as “hot money”. Trust me, its only “hot” because if we don’t move it at something approaching the speed of light, HB&B will grab it. The term “hot money” by the way comes from HB&B – they want us to cool it. That’s their modus operandi. Remember how they frowned on “day trading” and changed the trading rules for public day traders? An innocent bystander would think that a day trader is someone afflicted with aids, laying on a death bed. But who are by far the largest day traders in the world? Of course, its HB&B.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 4, 2007
#54
At the end of the day, it is up to each of us in the trading community to filter out the noise and the story-telling, and to listen to those independent and objective thinkers who put the needs of society (meaning yours and mine) ahead of the attraction of immediate personal gain (meaning theirs). Panzner is a person I believe you ought to listen to. His message, this year, is a difficult one to stomach because the broad market averages are screaming out weekly records, while, far from view, the risks are not so obvious. But the risks are there and credible analysts are telling you that.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 5, 2007
#55
It seems that all anybody has to do to get a short-term boost to their stock is to make an announcement or start a rumor. Why? Because speculators are not giving a second thought that all these deals are going to be done with debt, and the moment that interest rates hike past the tipping point, this equity market is doomed.
It’s tough, I admit for Joe, Joesy, Mom & Pop to not go along with the rising tide. But just remember, when HB&B decides to pull the plug, or gets in so deep they can’t avoid striking the iceberg, our ship goes down. Theirs will be protected by SRO rules, put options, short selling and delays in getting your orders to market.
I don’t care if you have a billion dollars in their bank, don’t for a second believe you are going to beat these people at their game. They have the place wired. All you can do is step out of their casino, for a while, and take a deep breath of fresh air while you await the slaughtering of the speculators that is needed before the market can return to normal. Just be sure to keep your own hands in your pockets and a stiff upper lip.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 5, 2007
#56
When anybody back-dates a financial record for the purpose of gaining a personal benefit at the expense of others, you are committing fraud. Full stop. And when you state that your insiders have done the research and discovered it was only an innocent mistake, I say you are guilty of lying and covering up, and you all ought to be sent straight to prison.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 5, 2007
#57
M3 continues to grow at an excessive rate. This money is being printed (i) to pay for a war and for govt deficits not matched by taxes, (ii) to keep private equity and corporations sufficiently well funded to manage takeovers as big as $100 billion, and (iii) to permit corporations, who can’t do it from operating free cash flow, to hike dividends and buy back shares.
The first point is driving the inflation cycle and the next two are driving speculation in the equity markets, now that this capital is no longer going into real estate at such a wild clip as we saw in the past three years. Some of that speculation will stick in the form of higher than necessary inflation, and the rest will send affected traders to the slaughterhouse.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 5, 2007
#58
I have been busy trying to automate as much as possible. Productivity counts. There has to be a system for everything. Everything has to be logical or I start to feel uncomfortable. You know where I picked that up? As a child. My Dad was an electrician. He believed that if you turn a light on at the entrance to a room that there should be a switch on the wall at the other end so that you turned the light off if you exited that way. Saves electricity. So we had double switches on every wall. It bothers me today to leave a light on if the room is unoccupied.
Another lesson I learned from an Aunt. When visiting as a youngster one weekend, I saw that nobody was leaving the dinner table and they were all looking at me. I had a plate half full of food, and theirs were empty, and so they waited, without saying anything. Until my Aunt told one of my cousins that I just didn’t understand the concept of waste. My wife will tell you that, psychologically, that incident made such an impression that I cannot leave food on my plate. Those childhood lessons have stayed with me for 50 or more years. There are systems and logic and the right way to do things. So when I start something I finish it. I understand why I am doing it.
To this day I have never taken a pamphlet that somebody in the street handed to me. I’ll even let it drop after hitting my chest. Why? Because logic tells me I’d never ask for that pamphlet. So you see why I became such an independent and objective person. It’s second nature to march to my own drummer, to figure out for myself how things work. And if I am curious enough, I will spend forever doing that rather than having somebody explain it to me.
I learned early that you ought to try to do for others what you hope they will do for you, but not to expect it. Most people are too busy trying to seize the day, taking from people, because they never figured out that what goes around comes around. They never learned the importance of logic, and systems, like me.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 5, 2007
#59
Politics sucks. And when judges get into the game, there isn’t any end to my scepticism. Btw, that judge accepted Stelco’s “bankruptcy” by valuing the iron ore and land assets at book, which is a fraction of the free-market value they are today – with no change at all since they departed his court – and that my friends is why suitors are lined up to pay billions for the so-called “new” Stelco. So most of these M&A deals are set-ups, and, well you know, the dead fish stinks from the head. The aroma of the marketplace today has simply become overwhelming.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 9, 2007
#60
All I’m trying to do is get into a zone where I think the price motion is likely to take us. Sometimes I’m right. One thing I know is that when I stop to think about it, and listen to the noise from talking noggins who don’t know a price from a company, I often go wrong. I need to be totally focused to be fairly accurate. Writing helps me do that because while my eyes are watching something else, I can be typing fast and letting my open mind speak my thoughts.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 9, 2007
#61
I am only pointing this out because it is important to me that you all understand that when I say the most important thing you can do as a person trying to make better financial decisions is to learn how to hunt in the forest, with learned skills and experience, totally ignoring the noise of others who have conflicting objectives. I’m not a “guru forecaster” or entertainer. I’m a teacher with a ministry. Enough said. I concluded yesterday, “Life is a matter of confidence… Don’t ever lose it.”
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 11, 2007
#62
If the US consumer is key to the direction of the global stock market, and I still believe that is the case, then trader be wary.” The Average Joe is not the least bit interested in the take-over deals or the share buy-backs and on and on, which push this market higher. But the personal income, savings and spending resources and habits are key to the long-term picture. This is why I rail when I hear the Kudlow’s saying that because the stock market is rising it means everything is good for the Average Joe. No, it’s good for the Gnomes, who then use their currency to take over yet another corporation whereupon the Average Joe loses his job.”
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 12, 2007
#63
I learned as a kid that without markers, you get lost easy. Some people never figured that out. And too many of those kids were not taught to NEVER listen to strangers. Trust me the market imitates life because the market is us.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 12, 2007
#64
This is a debt-related issue, and my advice is that one’s assets and liabilities must always be balanced in the worst case, which means, in that case, there is nothing left of equity. Wanting equity is why I chose to kill the liabilities. I don’t like debt, and moreover I know the world is awash in debt, seemingly oblivious to what lies ahead when asset prices sink. Surprise. Those liabilities don’t shrink unless you pay them off. So don’t get caught up in somebody else’s euphoria unless you can afford to pay off those liabilities when the banker comes calling, telling you you’re not as rich as you once thought.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 12, 2007
#65
I really enjoy the comments, but what concerns me is that readers might be expecting that all this ought to sink in over a short time. Let it mellow. Too many traders are deep into tactics before they understand strategies. Big mistake.
Take your time to look at the inputs that will impact strategies. When you have your strategy set, then get into tactics. When you get into tactics, don’t expect to be 100 pct right, and don’t put all your money on Red 8. Tactical decisions are different than strategies, but they too need a different set of inputs, and a different assessment before moving into action.
The operative words are “Take your time”. Too many traders here are too willing to gift their capital to skillful, experienced traders. You seem to think there is an Easy button. It drives me nuts when people comment, “I put a lot of stock … but I’m worried”. Learn to trade before you make statements like that. Then you’ll see that we are all worried. The minute we think we have the market nailed, it nails us.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 13, 2007
#66
It is a fact of life that capital markets are not free. To accomplish that objective, there would need to be a private sector management of capital market-related decisions made by the public sector. Then, for example, you would not find the so-called Strategic Petroleum Reserves buying/using/withholding buy orders/etc whenever politically expedient. You would not see governments sell all their holdings of commodities like gold, whenever politically expedient. Under private sector control of capital markets, the free market forces (“the collective individual”) would then dictate how government spends and prints money. After all, isn’t that the underlying nature of every democratic constitution.
That won’t happen in my lifetime or yours probably, because we are lied to and dumped on, but the least we as a caring community can do is to laugh in the faces of any elected representative who claims to be working in our interests and saying We The People have been provided a fair and transparent capital market, ie, the so-called level playing field we need. But, we could decide to oppose them, and work together to help ourselves. I’ll give you an example of how that could be done. We need people in our community who have no personal axe to grind and who work on the inside of the public and private sectors where these “government” trades are implemented, to issue alerts every time they do that. Tell the world. Let the real free market respond.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 18, 2007
#67
What we have is a system so conflicted in favor of HB&B that the table is tilted almost upright to facilitate the rolling of our capital right off and into their pockets. We have allowed, since the US Securities Act and subsequent regs of 1933-34, a no-lose situation for HB&B, and it is a disgrace. The conflict of advising the client and trading against the client at the same time, and having self-regulatory powers to resolve the client complaints is so sick that nowhere else in society would it remotely have a chance of occurring.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 18, 2007
#68
The pressure to hold this market from imploding must be fierce. Few people want to read and discuss Michael Panzner’s “Financial Armageddon”, but they ought to. Mean reversion is going to occur. It’s just a matter of when. The bigger the amount of juice injected into this market to keep it growing, the bigger will be the fall to reality. What will do it? The unwinding of the Japanese Carry Trade for one. At some point, the Japanese lenders will raise rates and want to collect on their loans. I suspect some of those loans will never be paid. A bankruptcy here, a bankruptcy there (hedge funds we’re talking about) will soon hit those Japanese banks and then watch how fast rates rise, and how fast the Carry Trade unwinds.
Another driver could be those Credit Swaps that underlie Private Equity’s recent penchant for debt. A failure here, a failure there will send HB&B scrambling. If a two-bit trading floor in nat gas futures has roiled a bank the size of BMO, what would happen if the loss was the size of Amaranth. Yes, Amaranth cost Mom & Pop’s pension funds mega-billions, but what happens when the loser is a mid to large-sized commercial bank? The Hong Kong Chinese can tell you what a run on a bank looks like. The lines around the block stop traffic, and depositors don’t take kindly to police barricades when family wealth is crashing. That’s a crowd that doesn’t need external agitation to erupt. Who knows when or where the problems start? I know I don’t.
At the end of the day, gold will always be good to buy the essentials of life, and to buy asset repo’s from HB&B, like houses and land. You see, you may not, at some point, have enough zero’s on the end of your Dollars, but bankers will always take Gold. They print money (through extension of debt), which is why they put their trust in gold. As soon as you see a big bank fail in North America, you can expect to see two long line-ups at your bank: one to withdraw paper money and another (if your bank offers it) to buy Gold bullion bars and coins. You won’t even be interested in a PM ETF at that point because that’s just paper too.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 20, 2007
#69
I can give two sides to every discussion, which is precisely why every good trader has to stop listening to advocates, and begin to look into the data points themselves for trend reversals they might track back to the price series reversals in the related stocks.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 25, 2007
#70
Crisis equals opportunity. I believe an ounce of gold is worth more than a ton of paper (well maybe a half ton, but you get my point). Is an ounce of gold in Venezuela less than an ounce of gold further down the Guiana Shield in Guyana, a couple hundred miles away? Do you really believe that Chavez will not permit foreigners to mine there and repatriate profits and pay bills, and so forth? If you do, that’s fine. Trade something else, but then forget the issue of KRY and GRZ etc. If you want to mouth off any further, then you are an advocate, and not a trader. Traders are always seeking opportunity. They like to see crises. When desperate or misled people throw away good assets like ounces of gold, traders step in to buy.
Traders know that there will be losses. They simply seek to keep those losses to a minimum and to try to have the average gains larger than the average losses.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 25, 2007
#71
Now, remember, this is not a system per se, but a disciplined approach to strategy where the time series analysis can help you track stocks of good quality companies into their AZ and DZ and to either make Buy or Sell decisions later. There are other factors involved in the actual buy and sell decisions, but these are nuances that depend on the individual’s personality and resources (time, money, experience, info, etc). The key point I make to those who are interested in learning is that market prices move in trends and cycles and it is your job to Buy at the beginning of a Bullish phase and to sell at the beginning of a Bearish phase. If you want to protect your wealth, with hopes of building it when times are good, there is no longer an opportunity of buying and holding forever the stocks of the best quality companies. These are merely prices and we trade prices.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 25, 2007
#72
So let’s call a spade a spade: this equity market is being driven by money that is being printed at a rate four times faster than the economy is growing in the US and well over twice as fast as the global number when you add in the most rapidly growing economies. That has led to a massive transfer of wealth out of North America and Western Europe and into the developing world, which in turn has led to inflation, speculation and corporate take-overs. At the end of the day, the global exchange rates are not stable, the global economy is not balanced, and the most threatening issues that Michael Panzner has outlined, at least in the US, are not being addressed – these being Debt, The Retirement System, Govt Guarantees, and Derivatives.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 27, 2007
#73
And, remember, wars don’t create wealth. In the past 250 years or so, the financial data clearly links war to inflation and speculation, where the prices of energy and metals and precious metals have risen until policy changes by monetary authorities brings the cycle to a close.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 27, 2007
#74
I still say, “The M&A game being played between Bankers and Gnomes is really quite stunning. Apparently there is no size corporation that couldn’t be taken out. The price is never right, but nobody seems to question it.”
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 27, 2007
#75
You see, we all live in glass houses, but if you allow some of us to be self-regulator, you can guess who will be the ones continuing to throw stones, or if you will, steal assets from the rest of us. We the People are getting fed up with the leadership these VIP’s are showing. It’s time these issues were studied.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on May 27, 2007
#76
After all, Goldman Sachs has taken control of the US Treasury, the Fed, the New York Stock Exchange and now the World Bank – all since March 7, 2006. Is it any wonder that when the majority of independent analysts figured that the current Bull market had ended in a normal 4 year cycle in May 2006 that along came Goldman Sachs to deem that the equity market would expand and that, with the help of Friends & Family in Humungous Private Equity Corp, they were “going to get theirs”?
Is this concentration of the nation’s financial control in the hands of a single private company what the US Founding Fathers had in mind? Is today’s Congress even the least bit clued in to what is going on here? I think it is time for independent thinkers, bloggers and investment analysts to speak up about this Goldman Sachs issue – now, before it is too late.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 30, 2007
#77
In every case I can recall where capital markets are manipulated by interventionists like Hank Paulson and his Friends & Family, the world has turned against it, and the prices have reverted to the mean, which means that as far as they overshoot on the high side, there will be an equally powerful opposite move.
I’m betting that as soon as Paulson finishes “getting his” — probably timed with the end of President Bush’s term — that counterforces will prevail. I expect the independent owners and managers of capital will feast on the servings of the “G” Team. What I am saying is that put buyers will exploit this melt-up. That move will, of course, be joined by the “G” Team, but the end result will be a terrible record in history for the current president and the “G” Team.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 30, 2007
#78
What the independent trader needs is an independent regulator, not a Bush appointee to head the SEC to take instructions from Goldman Sachs. If I’m the head of that independent market regulator, trust me the options trades in Chinese stocks yesterday would be checked for links to the “Gold”man and the “G” Team.
Not only that, but I would publish the results, transparently, whether I found a link or found there was no link. I would do that to instil the confidence of independent traders. What is happening today is just flat-out scepticism – and that cannot be healthy for capital markets. But it is the sign of a rotting empire.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 30, 2007
#79
I refer to these moves by governments as interventionist only because they trade in capital markets without the same transparency requirement as the rest of us, and for policy reasons that too often are at odds with our need (i.e., the private sector) to trade these markets with conventional portfolio management objectives. I think that is eminently unfair.
I believe a buck is a buck, no matter who owns or manages it, and that we should all play by the same rules, government and the sell-side included. The conflicts of interest in the present system are so extreme that I believe it is ridiculous to call the capital market a level playing field.
You can say that it is what it is, but I can assure you that unfair control systems (“might is right”) didn’t keep the Soviet Empire from collapsing swiftly when the People decided to make the change. We are all entitled to our opinions. Mine is that Paulson’s Pride is going to look like something pretty awful when the coin is flipped. At the end of the day, the People’s interest will prevail, and markets will revert to the mean. Henry Paulson puts his pants on same as you and me. He and his friends at Goldman Sachs are not capable of suspending the principles of financial markets for very long.
Posted by Bill Cara on May 31, 2007
#80
Just remember, wherever there is plenty of ointment around, there is always a fly close by. Ointment btw is that viscous semisolid preparation being spread around the Sell button – just so you might miss it on the way by. Be careful with these stories of capital managers with impressive positions. They have a vested interest to hold their positions until the last moment – and then they simply have too much capital in the market to pull out. I see this every few years, where the track record of these people after the Bear cycle plays out is less than inspiring.
That doesn’t make them bad traders; just traders with a very difficult job. For some reason the media likes to focus on those people – mostly when the Bull has reached an old age and some olé’s are needed to inspire it. Bravo, shouted the cheering section. Right before that final frenzy.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 3, 2007
#81
The bottom line is that I believe the US Admin and Fed are conspiring to keep the price of West Texas Intermediate light sweet crude oil lower than it should be. That skews the inflation data in the favor of these politicos who want to impress traders that inflation is not a serious problem, that interest rates do not have to rise, that equity prices should expand and, last but not least, CPI-indexed Social Security payments can be lowered.
I believe this is a fraud. Moreover, when the Admin/Fed want to kill the Bull, all they need do is start buying more oil for the so-called Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which will push the price into the 70’s, above the Brent (as it should be), which will cause the Fed to say, “We need to raise rates to head off the inflation-push caused by oil” and voila. Dead Bull.
But not before Friends & Family clear their inventory of stocks, and load up on puts. I mean why else would people spend several hundred million dollars to get elected to a job paying a couple hundred grand? It’s called ‘management control’ – otherwise known as an opportunity to ‘get theirs’. And when the equity market finally goes into the can, the Fed can slash their benchmark rate and tell you it was over the economy, stupid. It’s all so predictable. Maybe Disney should take the next Pirates sequel to Washington. Do you think?
Posted by Bill Cara on June 3, 2007
#82
In any event, the economic problems the Administration does not want to address are widespread. Higher energy, food and mortgage costs will break the budget of many Americans this time around. So we are in kind of a transitioning phase where bonds will become more attractive than stocks for a while. After stocks start to fall, the Fed will drop the interest rates and bonds will start to rally. But the momentum of falling stock prices will linger, and that is the time it will pay to be out of stocks and into bonds.
Then at the bottom of the long cycle for stock prices, it will be an appropriate time to switch back from bonds and into equities. Traders who don’t review all these charts every week cannot get a feel for the price motion. You will have an even more difficult time to make such decisions. For sure some CNBC talking head is not going to tell you what to do.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 3, 2007
#83
This is the dance I talk about. The motion is back and forth. Bullish, bearish, bullish, bearish. Once you catch on to the phenomenon, it’s like breathing. Occasionally, you get punched in the stomach by some market interventionist, which makes you scream, but after a while you start to play the game like Rocky. I’m already up to Rocky forty-something (LOL).
If you happen to be managing $10 billion, or more, it is not a fun game. But if you happen to be one of the Little People who has a clue, the whole business of personal wealth management can be as intellectually satisfying as pretty much anything.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 3, 2007
#84
I find it interesting how traders of stock prices can dismiss the fundamental, technical and economic data today in favor of a highly subjective bully pulpit report from the FOMC in order to gather enthusiasm to bid prices even higher.
At the end of the day, if we stick with long positions in the shares of quality companies, adding to these share positions when the prices cycle through the bottom of a bear phase, we will enjoy a solid portfolio growth. And when we speculate about the activities of central bankers, gnomes and politicians, what we are doing is assessing risk to our wealth preservation and growth plans.
There are people out there who would belittle this approach. Ignore them. They happen to be selling something. They might be saying, “Look at me, I have a nice website or the products and services I offer are better than others.” That is all noise, which if you let it distract you from the task at hand, you will likely fail at that task unless you happen to be lucky. Luck however is not a plan.
There are also people out there, including in our community, who are learning about markets, learning about themselves and how to trade those markets. Depending on your level of patience and understanding, you can choose to either help them or ignore them. But don’t let them discourage you, or take you off your plan because when they speak, they speak for themselves and not you or I. They may even be doing what you and I often do, that we must do, which is to try to assess risk.
Just remember, as the owner or manager of capital, your primary mission is to lose no capital.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 3, 2007
#85
What has happened around the world, with growth bursting in most countries – above the target rates — is the result of central bankers printing money at excessive rates to offset the printing by the Fed, otherwise the $USD would drop even faster. The flip side of that coin is that economies grow too quickly and wage and cost of living inflation rises even faster than economic growth rates, and speculative activity abounds. Hence the c.bankers must raise their benchmark lending rates.
What happens then is that rising debt service costs reach a breaking point causing traders to reassess risk. At some point they sell equities in order to lock in trading gains, and that sets off a broad selling wave. Many economists then say that the equity market should not be falling because the economy is expanding rapidly. But the issue is really related to the growing risk associated with the economy’s ability to meet debt service costs.
Every cycle, that risk becomes elevated, possibly extreme, based on the levels of wage and cost inflation, personal savings rates, interest rates, labor productivity, and so forth. In this cycle, because of a situation of far too easy debt expansion (“Liar Loans” it is called in the US) related to house-buying, the risk of credit failures is very high, even with interest rates that are relatively low compared to previous cycle highs.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 6, 2007
#86
The thing is that, at the first hint that profits will come off double-digit growth rates, at a time that interest rates are rising, traders will not stick around to see the forthcoming damage. They will continue to sell stocks and probably bonds, which will drive yields even higher, and stock and bond prices lower. That situation is the Wealth Effect in reverse.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 7, 2007
#87
The bottom line is that all traders need a systematic approach or trading discipline that includes some degree of flexibility. In other words there is both art and science involved in trading for success.
Now, I want to add a teaching lesson. Do you recall a couple weeks ago when I said that traders have to watch the M-W-D RSI-7 start to break down. The Sell alerts were coming at the very top of the cycle as the Daily RSI-7 on these stocks was dropping below 70. There were many of them. Most of you were ignoring them. Unfortunately. That would have been a good time to start taking something off the table in those stocks, or at the very least to put on some puts to protect your gains.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 7, 2007
#88
There is nothing like a punch to the nose to knock you down, followed by a whiff of the smelling salts to re-focus the mind and get you back in the fight. So, let me apply some consciousness-raising analysis.
As I have been saying for many years, the capital markets are not a level playing field. In no other facet of society do we permit such blatant conflicts of interest. I speak of our problem where Humungous Bank & Broker has been permitted by legislation (the US Securities Act and Regulations, 1933, 1934) to act as all of principal, agent, advisor and regulator. In recent generations, the leaders of HB&B have even furthered their interests by (i) advising and directing the affairs of government, including the establishment of a concept known as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT), and (ii) created self-benefiting financial products like credit swaps and ETF’s.
Once upon a time in America, in 1929, there was a great market crash, followed by an economic period known as the Great Depression. What happened then was that the leading capitalists of the day pushed the legislators in Washington to enact the most abusive, egregious piece of legislation the free world has ever known – the Securities Act of 1933.
What happened at that time was precisely what is happening today in that there was a credit bubble (caused by debts to buy homes, cars and stocks) that ballooned to a point where speculation became so extreme that the capital markets became unstable. I lay those problems at the feet of the bankers, as I do today, and when the bubble burst on Black Tuesday October 29, 1929, those bankers lost their wealth and influence over the market. Ergo the legislation of 1933 and 1934, which was enacted to give bankers power to control the owners and managers of capital, their clients.
Is there a sea change in capital markets underway today? Yes, but not in the way most people think when they look at red arrows popping up all over computer monitors. That is a temporary, and fleeting phenomenon, which will be shortly resolved by even higher prices of stocks and bonds.
The sea change underway today is the collective understanding and assessment by the owners and managers of capital that for almost 75 years their market has been hijacked by bankers and they have lost many, many trillions of dollars as a direct result. Even government, as atrocious as the management performance has been over the years, cannot come close to the theft of our wealth by bankers and their Friends & Family.
Just like 1929, we are headed toward a “Financial Armageddon” precisely as described by Wall Street-savvy Michael Panzner in his 2007 book by that name. For 75 years, the clock has been ticking; I don’t think we have ten years left to avoid another Black Tuesday (Oct. 29, 1929).
Posted by Bill Cara on June 8, 2007
#89
What we can do before Financial Armageddon inevitably strikes is to watch prices. We can continue to buy them when they are low and sell them when they are high based on relative historical performance and trading patterns. We can stick to trading the shares of quality corporations and buying risk-adjusted high-performance fixed income securities if that is our need.
We do not have to listen to the random noise that permeates the market place today, having our chain jerked from day to day. If we use preventative measures like put and call option strategies and stop orders, we ought to let a trending market (ie, extreme moves up or down as the case may be) take care of our decisions. That takes a little knowledge and much discipline. Other than writing about these things, I cannot do more.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 8, 2007
#90
Where we are is that some traders are saying, “We can’t time markets,” and that is a pile of rubbish. Would you rather just turn your capital over to the Sell-side, and let them have their way with you?
I suggest that people who talk silliness either do not yet understand capital markets or they don’t have a grip on themselves. For that reason, and thinking ahead fearing I would hear such talk, I decided to step up to the plate and, once again, try to use the market as a laboratory where I can teach and some people can learn.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#91
The books are being cooked. And they are, which is what I have been saying for years. Markets move when the Gnomes and HB&B want them to move, for reasons they have agreed to in quiet boardrooms and secure phones. There is no transparency in capital markets when the biggest players, including the Treasury Secretary and the Fed Chairman, are pulling the strings without disclosing their intent or their rationale.
Does this mean that We The People cannot use the capital markets to our advantage in protecting and building our wealth? Not at all. In fact, because we individually have so relatively little wealth, we do not have the problem that movers and shakers have. We can counter every move that large capital pools make. But, first we have to stop listening to their Talking Heads and stick to prices.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#92
You don’t have to be 100 pct accurate in your market timing to adequately manage your wealth. In fact, statistically speaking, you will never be 100 pct accurate. If you can be just 60 pct or 66 pct accurate and manage to keep your average losses smaller than your average gains, you will outperform (an educated guess) probably 95 pct to 98 pct of all professional capital managers.
Has nobody ever explained this to you or do you just not believe it? If it is the latter, I’ll give you proof. The fact is that capital markets are not rocket science. And even if you think so, how can you explain that in 1969 the first humans to walk on the moon were put there with computers that were 64k – not MB but just 64 kilobytes — of CPU. Isn’t it laughable that with 2 MB of dual-core CPU today, some people seem to think they cannot calculate the simplest of mathematics?
Pick good quality companies and buy their shares only at the cycle bottoms and sell only at the cycle tops; avoid debt, which often forces you to sell at a disadvantage; and trade within you emotional and financial resources and needs. It is that simple. No amount of spin by Talking Heads, or manipulation by movers and shakers, or exogenous events like weather, should ever take you off your wealth management plan.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#93
I learned a long time ago that every con artist needs an element of truth in the pitch to gain some credibility in order to hold the audience for the eventual sting. Perhaps America’s most trusted figure in the past century, Walter Cronkite, was asked by his CNBC host on the NYSE floor a couple years ago what advice he might have for broadcast journalists today. He replied, “Stick to the facts.” That was a warning to mass media that has been taken over by people with axes to grind. “Just the Facts, ma’am” – Sargent Friday (Dragnet, 1950’s).
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#94
Now when market trends change from positive to negative or vice versa, the analysis of RSI and MACD and technical indicators helps us make that assessment. More than any other task, it’s Job One to stay on the right side of trend. That one step will help us make 60 pct to 66 pct or more of winning trades, and also help us to make our average winners bigger than our average losers. So use the trend and cycle analysis of the price series, and buy only the shares of these good quality companies, and you will soon lose interest in what the Talking Heads and media personalities are frothing at the mouth about.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#95
Traders know there is a difference between price and value. Right now, for instance, traders around the world are watching central bankers print money at excessive rates (several multiples of the global economic growth rate), which devalues fiat money and increases the value of hard money (ie, gold and silver, which are storehouses of value).
Not to put too fine a point on it, but does anybody really believe that the value of these precious metals dropped -3.24 pct and -2.24 pct respectively in a single day, Friday? Why Friday? So you can sit and twist all weekend. The Treasury Secretary and Fed Chairman would like you to return to capital markets on Monday with an attitude adjustment, whereby you are transformed from Gold Bull to USD Bull. Some people actually put their trust and faith in the Treasury Secretary and Fed Chairman. I don’t know why, but they do.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#96
At some point, We The People of the World have to decide whether or not We are going to tear down Humungous Everything. I once thought that globalization might be a net benefit to global society. But those Thousand Points of Light turned out to be the rear end of an F-18 and I could see how people in once friendly nations didn’t care too much for the pointy end. I watched as CNBC rolled out their global format for GE-NBC, and how HB&B started buying all the banks (and stock exchanges) in Japan and China and wherever they could.
And I thought, “Is this truly what the customer wants?” No sirree, this is about putting more control over the many into the hands of the few. HB&B, Gnomes, Communist Party Central Committee Members, Russian Oligarchs, Middle East Warlords, what difference does it make? The next fight, you know, is where those people attempt to take control of the People’s Web – you know, the one where many-to-many communications gives power to the People – much like the Founding Fathers wanted for America almost a quarter millennium ago.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#97
On Feb 1 2006, when Prof. Bernanke took control of the Fed (that is until Paulson arrived at Treasury and his man subsequently became head trader at the FOMC), the annual rate of change was between 7 pct and 8 pct, and he soon cut off reporting important M3 calculations to the public.
So when these two move into a position of financial of the United States, the money supply is growing at between 6 pct and 8 pct and now it’s growing at 10 pct to 12.5 pct. And bankers create money by issuing debt. So, here folks, are two people who are at least in part responsible for the debt balloon. And when your financial assets fall, your wealth will fall because your debts to the bankers will not fall. This is the Wealth Effect in reverse.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#98
Anything goes these days. And what do we have to show for it? I’ll tell you – because it concerns me. Nobody can be objective these days because, heaven forbid, the advice might be negative, and “negative” doesn’t sell. The market is set up for people to buy. The market is marketing.
The thing is that nobody knows what the most powerful capital pools (I call them Gnomes) are going to do next. And what’s to stop the Gnomes from setting up the market by tipping one of those media personalities or Talking Heads four times in five as part of a sting so that the fifth time around the public gets played like a fool. So, if it’s not just pure incompetence, it is dishonesty we face. That makes things tough.
Now, standing on train tracks, or catching falling knives, or whatever, might be entertaining (and I try to do that of course), but it is not why I write this blog. I am not a guru; I am not a media personality. I am not a clown. I am just trying to use my ability and the financial markets as a laboratory to help build a community of caring persons who will share their knowledge and expertise to help the next guy or gal.
I know that if we work together, the community can lift up every one of us, and we will learn to take care of our own wealth, and not have it taken from us. That does not mean to say we have to do our own trading, for many of us cannot, but we must be able to manage the process. Those are my values and I hope they are yours.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 9, 2007
#99
With the hyper-inflated collateral values on the books at HB&B these days, the down cycle could be very bad. It was bad in 1990 when my parent’s next door neighbour came calling to see if he could find a taker for his property that had a $950,000 mortgage, valued at that point at $1.1 million. My parents bought that adjoining property for $300,000. Depending on whether you are in a cash-flush position or owing money to bankers, your perspective on life turns either bright or ugly at times like that.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 13, 2007
#100
At critical times like this, where markets can evolve through a sea change over a period of a few short weeks, it is incumbent of traders to watch for the right signs before making major changes to their asset mix and sector weightings. This is the time when asset managers earn their keep, and when the unseasoned trader gets sidetracked by emotional issues and the fog of war (to put a military spin on the capital market).
Posted by Bill Cara on June 13, 2007
#101
When you understand how markets work, you see that it is like a dance. There is an undulating price motion as market drivers go through an ebb and flow. Occasionally you get poked in the ribs or have your foot stepped on and you call that the work of an interventionist. All I am saying at times like that is there are participants in the market who do not share the values and the mission of independent buy-side traders who have a need to protect and to grow capital. So the market is a place of conflict, and unfortunately for you and me, the rules are not the same for the major interventionists (central bankers, Finance Ministers, bankers and so-called private equity). The game is slanted in their favor, which is a fact.
Now that is different than calling the market shady. I don’t call the market shady. In fact, I respect the market. There are shady operators in the market and it is our job to point them out to the regulators, and to register our complaints when we feel the regulators are not doing their job. Last evening, as a comment to yesterday’s Report, I pointed out the yeoman effort of Dave Patch. I hope you see that there are people in our midst who do care enough for fair markets, and who point to its deficiencies. You see, we will not stop in our efforts to force the authorities to give us capital markets that serve and protect the independent owner and manager of capital.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 14, 2007
#102
In every inflation cycle, this re-pricing scenario exists. It is happening today in housing because the government needs more tax revenues from real estate sales and property taxes and so forth, like they get from higher gasoline prices and cattle prices and so forth. As I say, the govt desperately does not want a housing market collapse because it needs the higher taxes that are pegged to higher prices.
In every inflation cycle, the value of fiat money drops, ie, it buys less. The only standard (also called storehouse) of value is gold, so traders who want to stay even with inflation, which destroys wealth, buy gold, and govt want them to believe that gold has less value, so they sell their stocks into the market to drive down prices, and at the same time they report highly biased consumer prices that understate true cost increases.
It is the pervasive intellectual dishonesty that tears at the financial system – things like a downgrade rating to HOLD really (wink, wink) means SELL, or a Financial Advisor is a representative who is licensed by regulators to advise, when the truth is they hold a license to sell. Today we are going to be told that Consumer Price Inflation is a reasonable +2 pct, when we all know it is not. When we (families, students, business people, whatever) compare our costs – apples to apples – of products and services we buy today versus a year ago, our costs have risen much more than +2 pct.
So the truth is we live a lie. And then we trade prices based on lies, which makes the task almost impossible. But we do what we can.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 15, 2007
#103
But, you do need to get onto the market’s wavelength. You have to feel the motion. That takes dedication and hours of intellectual work. If it was easy, everybody would stop the physical work and turn to trading for a living.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 17, 2007
#104
So, when the Gnomes and HB&B wanted some market relief they pulled down the oil price on Friday. No big deal. They had their Talking Heads say that fighting in the Middle East and Nigeria appeared to be calmer, the weather somewhat better, fewer hurricanes likely to make landfall, shorter driving trips planned this Summer, bigger inventor builds than anticipated, yada, yada. It’s all nonsense folks. It’s just their perverted way of selling the deal. I learned a long time ago that every con artist needs an element of truth in the pitch to hold some credibility in order to hold the audience for the eventual sting.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 17, 2007
#105
Now when market trends change from positive to negative or vice versa, the analysis of RSI and MACD and technical indicators helps us make that assessment. More than any other task, it’s Job One to stay on the right side of trend. That one step will help us make 60 pct to 66 pct or more of winning trades, and also help us to make our average winners bigger than our average losers. So use the trend and cycle analysis of the price series, and buy only the shares of these good quality companies, and you will soon lose interest in what the Talking Heads and media personalities are frothing at the mouth about. I continue to hammer away at the same information because it is valuable. Maybe nobody taught you this stuff before?
Posted by Bill Cara on June 17, 2007
#106
Look at the technical indicators on the charts and ask yourself if that looks like it is free of intervention. NOT!” It’s true. As the rich and powerful see that trendlines are close to being violated, and that unsophisticated traders will step into the trap, they deliberately move the price into the trap, close it, and then reverse the trend. They call it “eliminating the weak hands”.
But, we are onto their tricks now, right?
Rates will not collapse until equity prices collapse. Meanwhile the stage is set for rising commodity prices, and a weaker dollar that will be blamed on (who else!) China. End of story.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 17, 2007
#107
I was going to say, “case closed”, but the case is never closed, and market prices often don’t go where you expect. You’d like to think it is just the crowd pushing and pulling those prices, but alas the major influences over buyers and sellers are parties that have often quite different motivations.
Let’s keep it simple. Gold production is falling. Inflation, though possibly mild, is growing constantly. Fiat money is growing much more rapidly than real (enonomic) wealth, ie, where effective rates of return are obtained based on the risk involved. Unless central banks sell their gold holdings, the price is going higher. Why make it more complicated than that?
Posted by Bill Cara on June 17, 2007
#108
In the big picture of what is wrong with capital markets today, part of the story is the control of public media by a very few powerful individuals and organizations that have other conflicting interests. The problem with markets is, as I continue to say, the blatant conflicts that exist, and the layering of rules and regulations that are said to be for the public’s interest but that is pure b.s. These rules and reg’s are put in place by sugar daddy sponsored legislators to help the minority gain control over the majority. It sucks.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 21, 2007
#109
Years ago, I once had a private meeting with then Finance Minister of Canada Michael Wilson about my investments/analysis in securities in other countries. When it came to Germany, I mentioned a few names and he offered rhetorically, “Why not Deutsche Bank? When you invest in a country, why not through their large banks, which in effect is like holding a mutual fund since they cover the economy?”
Michael Wilson had been a senior officer and director of Dominion Securities, Canada’s largest component of HB&B, a company I also once worked for, and still have a high regard for. Mr. Wilson is presently Canada’s Ambassador to the US., and one of the smartest people I have met.
I never forgot that piece of advice about investing in a country’s banking system. In terms of India, banks are the place you ought to be directing your capital until securities markets there develop further as in Brazil. Eventually I believe that will happen.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 21, 2007
#110
The US financial system is out of control because money is being printed at an alarming rate to finance a series of military actions, homeland security actions, hurricane recovery actions, political pork, dubious tax policies, and an unbending effort by the politically powerful to help Friends & Family associates get theirs, while the getting is good. Unfortunately, this money is being created out of debt, which is not being repaid via the only sound way, which is through growth in real economic wealth.
Today, regrettably, the debt is being rolled up into more debt, and then into more debt. The great facilitator – the biggest con game I have seen in 40 years – is the Return of Capital game (ie, the debt-facilitated share buy-backs and increased dividends that exceed free cash flow of these corporations). This is not about return on capital, but of capital, and the majority of you are being fooled.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 24, 2007
#111
Party time in Brazil was interrupted this week. We’ll have to keep an eye on it.” Then a week ago, I added, “Well, ABV was the big story this week, rocketing up +9.5 pct. So, Party On! This stock is up +52.22 pct YTD and we’re still in the first half. Nothing else in this sector – on my Watchlist – is up over +10 pct YTD.” Parties in Brazil can start and stop on a dime. Have you noticed? Must be the Latin blood.
This week, ABV plunged -7.7 pct. The Party stopped. Apparently. Old worry-warts ought to stay away from this market. When the music stops, your arthritic fingers might miss that Sell button, and your heart might give out. Just a warning, mind you. If you are going to get out on the Brazilian dance floor, you better be in good enough shape to do a couple flips.
Posted by Bill Cara on June 24, 2007
#112
Yes, trading gives us hope in the same way that the struggling people in other lands managed to take control, doing it one stop at a time to build a mountain. Working together we can do it. In a virtual world, you and I and our brothers and sisters do not have to lock arms and raise our rifles to get ahead. We must, however, connect intellectually. We must share the same dreams, and we must plan, organize, implement and control our actions the same way that others have planned, organized, implemented and controlled us in order to get theirs. So the question is, are you going to adapt to the changes that are being forced upon us, or are you and I going to work together to bring about the change that benefits us? I think I know what you want. It’s now up to us to put it together.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on June 26, 2007
#113
There is a purpose in why I do this of course. It is because We The People can learn to play the games of the rich and powerful. Yes, we can learn to trade pieces of paper called securities. One security at a time. Security. Paper. Prices. It takes some learning, I admit. Nevertheless, we can beat them you know. We don’t have to shop at their stores or buy their products if they intend to spit in our eye with so-called executive compensation plans totalling $100 million dollars a year, and more. We have the power; we just need to be organized. And, in time, we shall. We shall because we must. Nobody out there is going to do it for us. We can teach one another the ropes… how to make 5 pct here, 5 pct there.
I know a little; I can teach you. You know a little; you can teach me what you know. Around it goes, until it becomes a fight between us and them. Actually between us and their computers. I say it will be their computers because, trust me, I have been there in the room with ‘them’ and they are not that smart. Experts at control is what they are. Games players. People who have been taught from youth to suck and blow at the same time. The rest of us are just trying to breathe. Yes, I care about people. Most, but not all, people. I care about the people who are fair to other people. There are a lot of them: CEO’s, lawyers, hedge fund managers, geologists, scientists, bankers even. These people are, in fact, mostly on our side. There is just one problem; We The People are not well organized to help one another. We have a lot of work to do.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on June 27, 2007
#114
When I am making decisions to support or not support a company, I look to the personal make-up of its Chairman and Chief Executive. I want to know how these people treat other people. I need to know if they believe in social equity or if they are the type of person who might work in darkened boardrooms to foist one over on us. I walk only on the ground I feel most comfortable. Over the years, if you do the same, you will find it pays off.
Qualitative assessments of a public company are just as important as the quantitative ones. Goodwill translates into higher share prices, lower cost of capital, happier employees, and ultimately better decisions, higher profits and more rapid asset growth, of a corporation.
Because of substantial bought-and-paid-for PR support of many of these companies, we, the owners and managers of capital, tend not to see beyond the veneer that is intended for us. We must look deeper because there are usually reasons why facts are hidden from us. I believe in transparency in capital markets, and in the notion that ‘sunlight is the best disinfectant’. I hope you do as well.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 1, 2007
#115
I have said here before that when these deals stop flowing, Hank Paulson and Prof. Bernanke will finally pull the plug on this over-priced market. The greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world will have been completed, and America will have sprouted its own form of oligarch. I call it Paulson’s Pride.
And we thought the debt bubble was about to burst a couple years ago. The Admin, Fed, HB&B and their Friends & Family were just getting started! What happened in the post-Soviet era, when control of public sector owned assets fell inexplicably into the hands of Russia’s new business and finance elite, is the mirror opposite of what has happened (is happening) in America. In America, control of private sector assets is being transferred from independent owners and managers of capital (We The People) to a handful of connected players. The mind boggles.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 3, 2007
#116
I am often asked if capital markets will ever be free. My usual answer is that as long as politicians get themselves elected to serve the economic interests of people other than the public who voted them into office, there will never be a level playing field.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#117
So there you have it. When trading international equity markets, your knowledge and forex trading skills have to be top-notch. If you don’t believe me, take a look at the Shanghai composite index vs the USD. Ultimately, international trade growth requires forex stability, but the monthly trade data masks the seriousness of the problem. The minute-to-minute forex and equity markets, on the other hand, show how much of a problem exists.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#118
HB&B has a job, in part, of securitizing mortgage-backed securities (MBS) or collateralized debt obligations (CDO). In the real world, there are checks and balances in place where a loan officer actually does verify the quality of the collateral. Unfortunately, HB&B lives in its own world, protected by the Fed and the Administration (Treasury Dept, SEC, etc etc), the Securities Act and Regulations of 1933-34, and so forth.
The bottom line is that HB&B is a Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO), a world in and of itself. The rest of us have to beg to deal with them. We have to pay them fees and commissions just to do a trade we could easily do direct electronically, if credit was not involved (so they make credit a part of it), even charging us to get the price disclosure of the trades we do. It’s all a racket, and has been for years. I know that because in my past I built out the top floor of the Toronto Stock Exchange building for a unit of HB&B. I was in their camp, doing what they do.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#119
Does it matter that risk-averse independent buyers have rejected a lot of that monopoly game paper? No, because HB&B live in their own world. They can take crap from the left pocket and put it into the right, very easily. There are no checks and balances. It’s called self regulation.
And when a court says there happens to be proof of wrong-doing and to go to jail for 30 months, along comes a higher authority to say the court erred, so please go free (just have one of your friends pay a $250,000 fine for you as you pass Go). So these people, the rich and connected, make up two sets of rules — one for them and another for us. It is after all, their game. They have paid to put themselves in that position, and we just have to nod our heads like dummies when they tell us they are doing this all for us.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#120
So, what has happened today is that HB&B can create crap-backed debt securities in one department and sell it to a brain-dead Fund manager in another department. Actually, he or she is a Managing Director who absolutely must do as told or else lose that mega-million year-end bonus (and the spouse, kids and lenders wouldn’t want that to happen!) The problem surfaces when interest rates start to rise, respecting the greater risks today of all that crap-backed paper (including the USD I might add). And when rates rise, the price of that paper falls. The owners then panic and try to sell to The Greater Fool.
Unfortunately for HB&B, we happen to be at the point today where the next Fool is demanding to know something about the collateral behind the paper that is being offered at a discount to clear their books. Funny thing; HB&B can’t validate that meaningful collateral actually exists behind the securities they are selling. The backing is after all nothing more than Liar Loans. And you can stack Liar loans from here to the moon and it doesn’t add any weight to your security. So why buy?
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#121
As always, your job is to understand and assess risk, and to avoid it where you can. It’s the job of HB&B and HPEC to pass through that risk to you, at least only to those who are stupid enough to buy it. If I do my job here for the Cara Community, it’ll be “only to the lonely” that HB&B has any success. I’ll be singing that tune until they clean up their act, and stop telling us we have a level playing field, and a system that serves and protects us. We know that is not true. It’s time they stopped playing games.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 6, 2007
#122
Why do wars and revolutions happen? Why is there an inflation cycle? This is not the fault of The People. The People are reacting, all over the world, and the biggest culprit in the eyes of most people, right or wrong, is the US. The global owners and managers of capital, of which Americans represent by far the largest component, have lost their confidence. Even Americans who own corporations are moving offshore and transferring jobs to places that are “friendlier” to their needs.
This is a reaction by The People to failure at the highest political levels, and mostly to the political process where the needs of The People have been abandoned in favor of self-interest or “other” interests linked directly or closely to politicians. At the end of the day, there is the need for truth, transparency, investigation, analysis, and finally decisions, of the highest order, for change. Politicians who are not predisposed to diplomacy and action will be the root cause for failure from this point on. There is not much time remaining before recession and inflation could lead to deflation and depression.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 12, 2007
#123
Rather than attribute the ills of the capital markets to the US subprime debt problem, which admittedly is a crisis for the owners of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) as the quality of the underlying security may have been misrepresented to them, let’s just face up to the fact there is a money crisis. Money, you see, is just a bookkeeping phenomenon that is materialized when somebody takes on a debt. So when financial people including bankers tell you ‘the world is awash in liquidity’ the liquidity is money and the money is debt.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 12, 2007
#124
The point is that the leaders of the G-7 nations (all political stripes) do not want to take responsibility for their own actions. They want to stand united in the making of policies that lead to deficits and also to the intervention into the lives of peoples in other sovereign nations. And that is wrong.
Moreover, the actions and deportment of the leaders in all facets of society, whether it be government, business, education, religion, whatever, serve as role models for their people. Presently, the leaders of the G-7 nations are failing their people, and they lack accountability and transparency. And that is wrong.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 12, 2007
#125
The falling USD has surely helped these large industrial exporters. When the $USD reaches zero, foreigners get to receive things like Boeing planes, United Technologies elevators, GE turbines and Honeywell control systems FREE. The buyers will just have to pay for delivery, which is going to be costly. These American workers will have jobs however, but they won’t be able to pay the required $100 per gallon of gas, and they’ll be stranded in their own country, unable to pay the airline fuel surcharges or the high cost travel abroad.
No, inflation is not a good thing. We’ve already gone from a 25 cent cup of coffee to $2.50. Next stop $25.00. Same coffee. Same smiling faces behind the counter. And with a cookie on the side, you can donate your change from a ten spot right into the clear plastic jar for donations, beside the cash register.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 14, 2007
#126
As I say, “Let’s keep it simple. Gold production is falling. Inflation, though possibly mild, is growing constantly. Fiat money is growing much more rapidly than real (enonomic) wealth, ie, where effective rates of return are obtained based on the risk involved. Unless central banks sell their gold holdings, the price is going higher. Why make it more complicated than that?”
Posted by Bill Cara on July 14, 2007
#127
All is fair in love and war, as they say, but traders have to dig beneath the superficiality of today’s reportage and appreciate that, unless the serious problems of the times are solved (see the list in Michael Panzner’s Financial Armageddon), the American Dream will die. The American capitalist/financier/politician who is in a position of control will continue to get his/hers from the system and move that wealth offshore to the developing economies, the new “new world”.
America’s middle class will become a lower class. Economic crime will expand; the fortress walls around planned (“segregated”) residential communities and office complexes will grow higher. The social system will break down under cost burdens. So, my point is that this weakening of America is coming from within; it is systematic, and evolving, like a child’s slinky toy bouncing down the stairs or, more realistically, like a Bear market phase where price cycles reach lower highs and lower lows until the bottom is reached, in exhaustion.
The hard part for all of us to accept is that, for historical reasons, Americans are the most optimistic people on this earth. Never say die attitude. But, like a cancer patient who refuses the essential treatment, which is to eradicate the cause, there will be no ultimate recovery. Eventually, the patient will die, all hope being taken away. For strong-spirited Americans, then, that is going to be a long and slow death.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 16, 2007
#128
We all have within us as individuals the power to achieve enormous goals, if realistic; but as a society, we have failed to do this because we have grown up to understand that life isn’t fair. People among us who have the power to do so have used it in their self-interest. A few people have exploited the many.
So those of us ‘in the many’ who actually care about social equity have to step up to lead the way. In a minuscule way in the context of the big picture, I have tried to do my share to help others. I have given – I am giving – all that I can. There are limits to what any one of us can do. We all must pitch in.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 16, 2007
#129
In technical jargon, equity markets are either range-bound (ie, they are side-tracking) or they are trending (ie, the major market indexes are moving up to a newer trading range, or they are moving down. The primary job of a trader is to stay on the right side of the trend and to make decisions that exploit it. The next most important job of a trader is to determine, within a long-term trend, the market phase or cycle of the current price motion, and to make decisions that exploit it. There could be either a bullish or bearish phase within a bull or bear market trend. Traders are always focused on risk before reward, which is why my communications here seem overly negative to people on the Sell-side. I respect their job – always looking on the bright side in order to sell something – but I also know my job is on the buy-side, which is to make the right decisions that, over the long-run, will protect and grow the portfolio.
This is the essence of my belief system in the equity markets. You can see it is a disciplined approach. Part of that discipline is to ignore people who are (a) on the Sell-side or (b) don’t know what they are talking about, but somehow think I possibly think they do. The hardest part of trading, for most people, is knowing when to sell. But if you have something to buy to replace what you sold, the task becomes much easier. Not all prices rise and fall together. Some, in fact, operate in counter-cycles. So there is always something to buy. The rotation of the portfolio in search of less risk and greater reward is a dynamic one. The dynamics of markets, and the intellectual challenges involved, are what makes trading possibly the most interesting way we can spend time. Time is the essence of life
Posted by Bill Cara on July 20, 2007
#130
As prices collapse, the road ahead to the next bull market is always under construction. There is always something to look forward to in capital markets. To protect and grow our capital, we just have to learn to be good traffic cops. We have to stay on the right side of trend, and be observant as to when cycles are reversing.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 25, 2007
#131
There is a rhythm to prices. As markets ebb and flow, we try to catch the waves that best serve our objective in maintaining and then growing the value of our portfolio.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 25, 2007
#132
Watching the trends and cycles of UK-listed stocks in their morning session is necessary to help do your daily set-up for North American listed stocks. With ADRs and all, many of these companies have inter-listed stocks, and also increasingly every company’s business is becoming global in scope. As capital markets do not operate in a vacuum, traders have to be aware of (i) what is happening to prices in other markets (ii) the causes of those price changes, and (iii) the potential impact on your portfolio.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 25, 2007
#133
All the time, longer-term, I am weighing today’s risk versus tomorrow’s potential reward. Moreover, I am always trying to assess where prices are with respect to trends and cycles, and the causes of that. Since nobody on the Sell-side is likely to tell me, and I am trading in competition with the Buy-side (ie, to out-perform the market indexes), I have to look for leading indicators (bellwethers) of probable future price motion. As I say, there is a rhythm to all prices. The market is a dance.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 25, 2007
#134
Always focused on risk before reward, I (and you) need to avoid the big pull-backs, and we need to be positioned (long in the best value-priced stocks of the highest quality companies) to take advantage of the rallies. That means we have to be rotating out of the past winners and into what we believe will be the next winners from our portfolio watchlist. There is a rhythm to prices. As markets ebb and flow, we try to catch the waves that best serve our objective in maintaining and then growing the value of our portfolio.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 26, 2007
#135
As to the overall market and gold specifically, the gold trend and cycle is a known lagging indicator of a broad-based Bull market. In a Bull fight, the Bear takes down the paper-backed securities first (credit market based interest-sensitive stocks) because they are the weakest storehouses of value. Next to come are the stocks of the companies that hold assets comprised of brand and patents and so forth because these companies have products and services people always need and use to some degree through thick or thin. Finally comes the commodity-based producing companies, which because of their control of the supply-demand economics can stay stronger longer. The strongest of course is the goldminer producing companies because gold is real money – a permanent storehouse of value. So, when the Gold Bear arrives on the scene, it is almost always a case of having desert to end the meal. By then, the rest of the market has already been consumed.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 26, 2007
#136
So let me state my position with greater clarity. I’ll even use words you read here every day. I set mental stops no worse than -8 pct from the cycle high, which, in the case of the Nikkei 225 is near the 16600 technical support level, or the FTSE at 6500, or the DJIA at 12750-12800. If violated, I would be out. These are the three most important equity market indicators in the world. If one breaks down, I have stated all along that because of inter-listings and the global influence of market drivers that the other major equity indexes were likely to also break down.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 27, 2007
#137
The point is there are always two sides to a market. The market is a barometer of human emotion. Unfortunately, too many of us play “Doctor” rather than focus on what is important, which is our own portfolio. At the end of the day (which never comes by the way because trading is a continuous process), traders have to do only a couple things in order to operate a successful portfolio. They must (i) find, buy and continuously add to long positions in the shares of high-quality companies, and (ii) work at constantly lowering the cost base of portfolio holdings, and raising the dividend/interest income of that portfolio. The essence of what I am doing is using a protocol to help me buy low and sell high the shares of companies that are financially strong, have management I respect for their track record and their values, and where the operating performance of the company is leading its peer group.
Nowhere in all of that is the need to call tops and bottoms of markets. Already you can see that there is as much art as science to the process of portfolio management. To become good at art and science takes learning, practice, time and focus. That’s often a disappointment to young people. The good news is that the process is simple and straightforward. It’s not nearly as difficult as learning how to become an accomplished musician, rocket scientist, or professional athlete. Anybody can do it.
Trading is a process that exploits the rise and fall of market prices. If you are confused, then you have not yet captured the essence of trading, which is to buy low and sell high, or, if you wish, to sell high and buy low. You haven’t yet learned a simple trading discipline like the one I use. You probably are listening too much to other people, and not putting enough time and focus into your own portfolio. I hope you look upon the market as a trading laboratory – a place to study price change, economics, human behavior and self-introspection. Just think, if prices didn’t rise and fall, we would not have this opportunity.
Posted by Bill Cara on July 28, 2007
#138
Given that America has chosen the road of entertainment and deception rather than hard work and genuineness, and that countries like China and India are going in precisely the opposite direction, and have the mass population to make a difference, who do you think is taking the right path?
And with that in mind, I noted that the S&P 1200 global index has now a US weighting (ie, S&P 500) of about 47 pct, down from 50 pct just a couple years ago. In a few years that weighting will drop to 45 pct, then 40 pct and lower. America is losing the competition for economic supremacy to the developing nations. In 20 to 40 years, this issue will not even be debatable. America will have lost.
I have thought about this a lot recently because conflict of interest seems to be pervasive in America and it is pulling the country down. Realistic goals and teamwork, are essential at this point. America’s top-down focus on entertainment and deception must be supplanted by the opposite values, including hard work, family and friendship, which just happen to be the values of the average American today and every day since Independence Day.
Leadership at every level of government, business and the professions must stop trying to “get theirs”, and return to leading the people. Until they prove capable of the job, I think the owners and managers of American capital are going to keep moving that capital into other countries, to the detriment of America. Europeans did the same until over the past 50 years they managed to pull together to stabilize the region. So, the job, as big as it is, can be done.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 2, 2007
#139
Nothing is worse to me than the notion of slavery—or better than emancipation. If there is one thing I stand for most, it is personal sovereignty, freedom, independence. Nobody could own me. I am in debt to no one. I would do without (and I often do), before I would go into debt.
Not provided much in the way of material things in life, early on, it has been a struggle. Most of us know that struggle. In my case, it’s why I developed an ability to think, and to use my intelligence to succeed in life. Yes, I got to be ‘boss man’ in the penthouse of the stock exchange tower because of the use of intelligence, not because I bought my way there. But, it’s why I share what I can with others, because I know they can help me in return, and together we can help people less fortunate.
This is a life’s mission, wherever life takes me.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 3, 2007
#140
Unlike medical terminology, market terminology is rather imprecise, and different people will use the same words to mean different things. The argument I am offering here is that the market is as complicated as we choose to make it, and in listening to every guru who has an opinion, and a different methodology of every type imaginable, we are making it tough on ourselves.
I have a very simple mechanical system. I contain my subjects of prime interest (my portfolio watchlist) to a limited number of high quality companies. Then, with the knowledge companies go through periods of thick and thin like we all do, I simply accumulate positions when the Monthly-Weekly-Daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) technical indicator is below 30 and distribute when it is over 70 for each stock. There are, if you follow this blog closely, some nuances to this methodology, but that is the meat of it. It follows then that when the bulk of the portfolio has been distributed (ie, sold off) and not replaced, I am in cash.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 5, 2007
#141
The problem of course is that America is built on conflict of interest. The SEC has many masters. The elected representatives, supposedly their overseers, also serve many masters. Big money talks, so you know is the top dog. You see, when small companies run into situations whereby their screwed up accounting and reporting systems don’t permit on-time filing to the SEC, they get slapped with notices and fines. But when the GSA’s can’t determine their assets from their liabilities, as was the case in the past couple years when their financial officers could not file financial summaries worthy of the paper they were written on, and so they just stopped filing, where were the SEC and the NYSE? Not a peep.
And then these people have the utter gall to tell us to our faces, in speeches and on TV through their every talking head, that we have a level playing field. I’ll tell you who has a level playing field. The answer is no one. You either have big money to tilt the table so that the chips fall into your pockets or you don’t have the money to buy off the regulators and self-regulators, so your chips are always slip sliding away from your grasp. This isn’t the Treasury’s doing, and it’s not the Fed. It’s both houses of Congress, the White House and HB&B to blame. The people with the biggest money have the lobbies in place to have things go their way.
But, seriously, something must be done to stop the nonsense. The SEC is a source of the problem, and not the solution. And it’s never the people who work for the SEC or HB&B for that matter; it’s the structure and the people who are in positions of oversight power and control. They are conflicted, and conflicts get resolved in America, not by who is right, but who is wealthy. This situation has been bad for years; it’s getting worse.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 5, 2007
#142
Don’t let anybody ever tell you not to meet a margin call. Would you prefer to have your broker pick the stocks and the timing? If you think that’s going to be fairly done, then you really do suffer from credulity syndrome. So meet the margin call enough to keep you in control long enough for you to do the selling job on your terms. But, I do agree that if you get margin calls, you are clearly operating too close to the margin of safety, and you will likely end up losing a lot of equity.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 5, 2007
#143
A trader’s first objective is to reduce risk and then address profit opportunity. If you want to be that swimmer who drowned carrying gold bricks in each hand, so be it. But, to succeed in trading you have to manage risk above all else. If you buy the extreme dips in good quality companies, you have reduced risk to start. If the price subsequently lifts, then you have some profit to take off the table to apply to your cost base. The lower your cost base, the more relaxed you will be. Rather than thinking the possible gain you are missing, start thinking of the process of reducing your risk. When your risk is eliminated or almost eliminated with a near zero cost base, but steady dividends, you can then look at blue sky. Everything at that point is blue sky.
Posted by: Bill Cara [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 8, 2007
#144
It appears that Wall Street has won the day. This is pathetic. However, if this were a free market (as we are told it is), gold would almost certainly start to lift after that news of Fed action. There will be no end to the nonsense, it appears. Wall Street combined with Financial Entertainment TV is a powerful lobby. The public has been completely hoodwinked by what is going on today.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 9, 2007
#145
“Buy into weakness; sell into strength” is a successful traders mantra.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 15, 2007 (and many other times)
#146
I read today in the current Annual Report of Swiss banker EFG, where I am setting up an account, the following words of wisdom: “In any walk of life, the apex of achievement is inhabited by those who concentrate on what they are good at, in extraordinary fashion.” I try.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 11, 2007
#147
I never knew they were in so deep into the sub-prime quagmire, but I suspected as much when for the past month the hits they took in the stock price were strongly correlated to the others that are burdened with these problems. That’s the thing with the financial services industry: rule #1 is to keep everything close to the vest when facing the worst. They preach transparency, but it is the last thing they intend to do.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 11, 2007
#148
My point is you are managing a portfolio. You never have to hit the top or the bottom price (in fact you can’t); it’s the percentage gains (and percentage losses avoided) that count. By focusing that portfolio on a watchlist of say 100 stocks, you will get to know them, like family. You will see that each stock is traded within its own community. Many of the traders are professional, and much of the trading is via programmed trading. So you need to focus. That means reading all the news. Reading the Value Line or other Wall Street research reports. Watching price and volume closely whenever the stock gets into the Accumulation Zone or the Distribution Zone, which is decision time.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 12, 2007
#149
I am looking forward to a day when I can opine that the capital market has returned to good health following a cyclic reversion to long-term mean average prices. That will happen after the cycle trough is in place, likely sometime near the end of 2008, when optimism and confidence of new leadership in the US (whichever person, whichever Party) sets in and lays the path for a new long-term Bull phase.
I am not a perma-Bear. Roughly one-quarter the time I am Bearish, one-quarter Bullish, and half the time Cautious. The past two years you have seen my cautious side, with occasional periods where I have been inclined to bearishness and later bullishness. It is a fair comment that I have been too cautious over the past 25 pct gain in prices. Let’s just say that age and experience made me do it.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 14, 2007
#150
Remember, it’s the best traders in the world who are right about 65 pct of the time; the worst about 35 pct. When there is a string of losses, which happens to the best, you reduce your order size and try to limit the average percentage loss. If you don’t, you lose your confidence.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 14, 2007
#151
And for those people who say they have this market figured out, I say that’s nonsense. Nobody, at this point, knows how far the G-20 central bankers are prepared to go to stem a global liquidity crisis. I say that the Credit Derivatives market is so far out of control that these central bankers cannot let the situation unfold much longer. Otherwise worry and concern will turn to fear and panic.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 14, 2007
#152
Always the possible trend turn points are the most exciting to traders. It’s where the most money is made by good traders. What is usually a good strategy at these points is to buy both a put and a call. As soon as direction is established, you then close the incorrect option for a small loss and take a big profit on the other one.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 15, 2007
#153
The standard line is don’t meet a margin call, but I think that is the worst thing you can do. At times of margin calls, the broker-dealers are also probably having “issues” and your first priorities become their last ones. The only answer is (i) have system in place for selling before there is a panic in the market, (ii) pay down margin debt as quickly as you can whenever you feel uncomfortable with risk/reward, so you don’t fall into a margin call situation, and (iii) sell, before the broker does, any stock that you least want to hold during a pull-back.
Margin calls are one of the times in markets when brokers will tell you that the client is relieved the broker made the final decision, even if it wipes them out. Many accounts simply cannot bring themselves to sell, or take a loss. They treat their stocks like children. The psychology that goes into trading is simply amazing, and never more apparent than at trend turns.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 15, 2007
#154
I take the capital markets seriously. I have simple systems or protocols to follow that help make that 65 pct of trades I do a winning one and not a loser. I use time series analysis of market data. I don’t read and be influenced by the offerings of other publishers. Let’s leave it at that.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 16, 2007
#155
Did I not opine months ago that the global issues would first start in Japan? My logic was simple. The global debt balloon was growing directly due to the failure of the Japanese monetary authorities (Bank Of Japan) to protect their currency by raising interest rates. They had taken a government promoted strategy of allowing the Yen to fall to support exporters and employers in Japan. That was fine to a point, but the action became extreme, and global capital markets, which ought to have peaked in May 2006, became extended on the upside.
So blame the current events on what has been the inevitable unwinding of the Japanese Carry Trade. As traders sold stocks and bonds to repay debts denominated in Yen, the major hedge funds and banks in Europe and America found themselves in a credit squeeze. They didn’t want to pull the plug on the sub-prime lenders, which was going to kill their mortgage industries, which in turn would kill their home-builder industry.
So, effectively, without a source of liquidity they needed to meet their own obligations and serve their own interests, the US banks and brokers, with the help of their friends in Financial Entertainment Media, went screaming to the public that the Fed had to loosen the money spigot. Recognizing a crisis, but not wanting to exacerbate the lurking inflation problem, the Fed joined in with other G-20 central bankers in injecting short-term funds into capital markets.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 17, 2007
Switching back and forth from long to intermediate to short term and then back is very grinding on the brain. Usually I can do it, and that’s why I have in the past called myself a computer. But in fast and hugely volatile, emotionally driven, markets, let’s face it, I’m like any of you; any brain can only take us so far.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 17, 2007
#156
So, do I think that HB&B can ultimately solve their problems? No. That’s why I am short-term bullish (the Fed’s help!) and longer-term bearish (the magnitude of the problems that exist!). America, if you want to line up the dart board, has sooo many problems, it’s hard to start listing them. Read Michael Panzner’s excellent book Financial Armageddon to appreciate the magnitude of the overriding problems.
This week, the Fed and their colleagues in the G-20 have delayed the inevitable. Traders have to see that. So for 2-5 months, it’s going to be ok for the Bulls; after that I believe there will be horror stories to those who didn’t protect their wealth.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 17, 2007
#157
So rather than fall into the trap that engulfs the perma-Bulls and perma-Bears at times like this, let me just say that as prices fall, as they are now, your opportunities for wealth building become greater, and when they rise to levels that had existed up to a couple months ago, your risks of wealth destruction were highly elevated. You look to sell high and buy low. In my case, I’d appreciate other bloggers would get that simple point. Trading is as difficult as anybody wants it to be. I don’t think it is rocket science.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 16, 2007
#158
Your primary job as a wealth manager is to stay on the right side of trend, so if there has been a trend turn in most or all of the broad equity markets of the world, how do you know? What indicators do you look for? And if you receive confirmation, do you change your trading strategy and tactics? These are the important issues. The rest of what you see and hear from the Screaming Mimi’s of Financial Entertainment Media you can chalk up to random noise, the fog of the trading war.
All I can advise at this difficult time is to stick to your knitting. You are responsible for a portfolio, whether it is self-directed or managed by others, and you should have a plan, so work the plan. If you don’t have a plan, now is as good a time as any to start.
#159
Here is what I think about the Bull versus Bear market question. I believe the Bear started a primary cycle and has just completed the first of three or more intermediate-term waves down from peak to trough. At this point in the long cycle, I think the broad market has started its first correction, which ought to take prices back up from 62.2 pct to 100 pct of the magnitude of the decline that occurred in the past couple weeks. I have opined that close to the former highs will be reached before the next intermediate-term wave starts to slide to new lows. Typically, it is the second wave that is THE BIG ONE.
So, if I am right, where do we look for confirmation? Briefly, with no intention to discuss the details today, I look for: (i) sector rotation where the Financials and Techs are First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and the Commodity price beneficiaries are LILO (ie, last in, last out or in other words the laggards), (ii) the stocks of financially weakest companies in an industry breaking down early, (iii) the high beta, higher-risk, international markets, like Indonesia, suffering the biggest losses first, (iv) news of continued liquidity squeezes as banks move to clear off their highest risk assets (ie, loans), (v) declining trading volumes on rallies, with the slowdown effects shown in the share prices of the electronic (direct access) brokers, (vi) increasing strength of selling at technical resistance levels (ie, the former support levels in a Bull market), and (vii) shorter time spans between peaks and also troughs of trading patterns, as Bear market prices tend to fall faster than Bull market prices rise.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 18, 2007
#160
In other words, I’m like a commercial banker, only my portfolio is my business rather than rating other people’s credit, and I keep my system but change the standards where I try to make decisions. In Bull markets, I loosen the grip (and let prices run to the upside into riskier levels) and in Bear markets, I tighten my standards (and do not allow prices to run far to the downside before selling, and I want to see them more depressed before I buy).
Unquestionably, there is much art to the science. It’s like a dance. Dancers are aware of the pace of the rhythm, and change their actions accordingly. Right now we have been doing the quick-step, whether we want to or not. As the pace slows, in the context of a Bear market, we don’t want to be caught out in a game of musical chairs, so we are on constant alert that we’ll be back to the quick-step in a flash.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 18, 2007
As long as we operate a securities portfolio the same way we would any business, we’ll likely be ok. Some businesses fail for the wrong reasons unfortunately, but for the most part a business that has a solid plan and good execution of that plan will be successful. Trading is the same. It is not the rocket science that self-serving interests would have you believe.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 18, 2007
#161
The other thing; I have noticed that the more you write, the more comfortable you get, and your writing (most people anyway) gets more fluid. That reminds me of the time I spent starting up Qtrade, when I hired about 16 young managers and supervisors from Canada’s leading discount brokers. In a team, all contributing, I watched young people (26 to about 34) grow in self confidence by the week. After a couple months, I had so much confidence that I would say pretty soon I could put that team up against any group of 16 their ages on Wall Street. Experience is the critical factor. You can get all the education and information in the world, but you need experience. I see that in the people who are writing and communicating back and forth here, and it’s music to my ears. It’s what I hoped would happen. Thank you.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 18, 2007
#162
Ah yes, “Bad debts, foreclosures, the end of the “liar loan” practices, Fed tightening, whatever; this consumer lending game died. “ Just remember, “If the Average Joe cannot pay up at the end of the month, it is HB&B that forecloses.”
Posted by Bill Cara on August 19, 2007
#163
The sub-prime issues are not confined to just the US of A. Humungous Bank & Broker has facilitated the aberrant behavior of real estate backed lenders all over the world. In addition, hedge funds all over the world participated in the use of US Treasury debt to over-leverage (some even hyper-leverage) their buying, which was also facilitated by HB&B. These problems have not gone away. The G-20 central bankers have merely poured gasoline on a fire that was quickly going out. They did it a year ago May, and again now and they may try again, but at some point, all that fuel will cause a re-pricing of gold.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 20, 2007
#164
there are serious issues. You will read about them. Acknowledge them, but then move on. You have a responsibility to manage your portfolio, not solve the world’s problems, or worry about them to the point you fall into a depressed state of in extremis. Traders act. They trade. There is a time to buy and there is a time to sell.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 20, 2007
#165
Keep your eye on prices and stick to time series analysis of those prices (RSI and MACD). This is a rally, but the Bear market process will unfold now over the next year or two. Rallies in Bear markets are called corrections, for some reason. Whatever you choose to call them, they are shorter in the elapsed time for each cycle than is the case for the average cycle in Bull markets. And, Bear markets are defined by a series of lower highs and lower lows. So this rally has limited legs, as I see it.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 20, 2007
#166
It is all about solvency today, which yesterday I referred to as the task of keeping the credit ring intact. The credit ring among financial institutions is only as strong as the weakest links. If one company fails, that could lead to a dozen or more companies failing, leading through an immediate series of iterations of failures until the entire financial system collapses.
These are interesting times. I do not recall a time when there was so much talk of failures by large financial institutions and/or their subsidiary companies. However, traders have to focus on prices. We also ought to be discussing news reports of credit ring problems and failures of hedge funds because market risk is one thing, and capital risk quite another.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on August 21, 2007
#167
Traders always deal with information they have today. What comes down the road or may come down the road is more nebulous, so we have to deal with it as it takes shape at a later time.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 22, 2007
#168
The difference between the sell-side and the buy-side is that we, the owners and managers of capital, can be independent and objective. Those of us who act as such have a long leg up. n fact, for the years I was on the sell-side, my biggest embarrassments came in the stocks of companies for which I was, for whatever reason, biased. I’m passing that costly lesson to this community. Without question, my greatest successes came from the times I operated in what many would call a mechanical mode, ice water in my veins, and so forth. When you treat your stocks like your children, and your home like any investment, you will lose every time.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 23, 2007
#169
Whether you are working on a sell-side team or a buy-side team, you are working on a team. The discussion should always be about “we”, not “I”. Just like individuals, sometimes those teams are sound and sometimes deficient. If you ever join a team, you ought to look for the former. Some people get ten years experience in one year, whereas others get one year’s experience in ten.
Generally speaking, the people who work for HB&B are well educated, serious career-minded individuals. Many, however, get stuck on bad teams. I have always said that it’s the structure of the industry that permits conflicts of interest that causes most of the problems at HB&B. It’s not the people in most cases.
Posted by Bill Cara on August 23, 2007