« Cara’s Bull Board, Fri., Mar. 16, 2007, 8:58 AM | Main | PDAC 2007 – through visitors’ eyes, Sun., Mar. 18, 2007, 3:33 PM »
March 17, 2007
Week #11 (2007-03-17) in Review (FINAL)
This week was one of the most fascinating in capital markets for many years, in my opinion, and yesterday was a day of television that I believe must have left the world agog. Yes, we live in interesting times.
CNN aired an interview of Donald Trump by lead anchor Wolf Blitzer where Trump called President Bush, "probably the worst president in the history of the United States," adding that former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was a "disaster".
And, about the Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, “… a lovely woman but she never makes a deal. She doesn't make deals. She waves. She gets off the plane, she waves. She sits down with some dictator, 45 degree angle. They do the camera shot. She waves again. She gets back on the plane. She waves. No deal ever happens.”
About the White house, Trump says, "I don't know what's going on. I just know they got us into a mess, the likes of which this country has probably never seen. It's one of the great catastrophes of all time."
The world is watching.
Later in the evening, ABC News Barbara Walters interviewed Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who says that with a name like Nicky Chavez, he’d be a popular political candidate in the US. Like I say, interesting times.
Walters: "As I talk with you, you are a very dignified man, but we have heard you call the President of the United States a devil, a donkey, a drunk, a liar, a coward, a murderer. What does all this name-calling accomplish?"
Chavez: "Yes, I called him a devil in the United Nations. That's true. In another occasion, another time, I said that he was a donkey because I think that he is very ignorant about things that are actually happening in Latin America, and the world. If that is in excess on my part, I accept. And I might apologize. But who is causing more harm? Do I cause any harm by calling him a devil? He burns people, villages, and he invades nations."
I have always thought it is unfair to demonize people like Chavez or Bush, but frankly, last evening, I was surprised at just the opposite. Walters seemed to play up to Hugo Chavez, and her co-host even concluded by remarking about the man that he is very “impressive on TV”.
I am raising these items because something strange is going on in television today. It appears to me that America is starting to go overboard in its feeling bad about itself and to indulge in self-criticism. This is not good. There is a clear and present danger to capital markets should these emotions become obsessive.
A week ago I wrote,
We – the owners and managers of capital – are about to go into battle. The enemy is the economy, presently excessive market multiples, the constant random noise and misinformation of Talking Heads, and greatly heightened socio-political conflict in the world. Prices in our stock and bond markets are likely to come under fire. If we are not prepared to defend and to counter-attack, we will lose.Most of you were unprepared in 2000 for the devastating capital losses that the People suffered through 2002. Back in 2000, I was not around to help as I was working 100-hour weeks to build what is now a successful national securities brokerage, but I am here today.
My concern is that many of you will obsess over the negatives that proliferate in Bear markets, which may cause you to miss the buying opportunities that, in time, will appear.
Just remember the expression, “Things are never that good, and they are never that bad.” As we move forward in time, there is a constant reversion to the mean.
If you remain objective and independent in your thinking, you’ll be able to see all that.
Global Market Summary
International Equities: Yes, I noted that, a week ago, the markets had bounced back, but not by much. This week they continued to sink. The Nikkei 225 dropped -2.45 pct, while the EWJ (Japan market ETF trading in the US in USD) dropped -1.91 pct. The FTSE 100 of the UK dropped -1.84 pct while the EWU (UK market ETF trading in the US in USD) dropped -1.46 pct.
U.S. Equities : All broad indexes fell a little. The higher beta Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 small cap indexes dropped -0.62 pct and -0.81 pct respectively, while the usually more staid S&P 500 and Dow 30 dropped -1.13 pct and -1.35 pct W/W. General Motors (GM -5.9 pct) was enough on its own to sink the Dow 30 a little more than the others. Other than a technical bounce on Wednesday afternoon, there was not much this week for the Bulls to write home about.
Dow 30 : This week it was 22 down and 8 up. A week ago, the numbers were reversed. The biggest winner W/W was AT&T (T +1.2 pct). Together with a prior week gain of +0.3 pct, that equals the loss of -1.5 pct two weeks ago. Let’s not kid ourselves that things are good. Over the past four weeks (see Table 14), all 30 of the Dow 30 are DOWN. GM is down -20 pct; Intel and Home Depot are down -10 pct, and the big banks (my whipping boy, HBB) have been hammered: Citigroup down -8.6 pct; JP Morgan down -8.2 pct. Giants Exxon Mobil (-7.3 pct) and Microsoft (-7.5 pct) are right in line. That’s quite a month.
U.S. Sector ETFs: Only one (XLU) of my ten sector ETF’s was up this week, whereas all ten had been up the previous week. Consumer Discretionary Spending (XLY), the worst this week, was down -2.5 pct, and over four weeks is down -6.6 pct. Only Financials (XLF) (-7.3 pct) is a worse performer over four weeks. So this pull-back is not about gold, and it has zero to do with day traders or Hugo Chavez or Donald Trump. The problem is the shaky US housing and mortgage markets, and the potential impact on the economy and on personal spending and consumption.
First segment: most influenced by global commodities, forex and capex spending
10: Energy (XLE): #8 (-1.8 pct); Despite crashing oil prices
15: Basic Materials (XLB): #2 (-0.6 pct); Tin, nickel and copper squeeze
20: Industrials (XLI): #3 (-0.6 pct); Fedex (FDX) got whacked
Second segment: most influenced by U.S. consumer spending and economic growth
25: Cons. Discretionary (XLY): #10 (-2.5 pct); More horror, worsened by GM
30: Cons. Staples (XLP): #5 (-1.1 pct); OK for WAG, but 9 of 10 down
35: Healthcare (IYH): #6 (-1.2 pct); JNJ and AMGN pulling things down
Third segment: most influenced by U.S. interest rates and general economic health
40: Financial (XLF): #9 (-2.4 pct); Down -5.2 pct YTD
45: Tech (SMH chips): #7 (-1.5 pct); QCOM jumped +8.8 pct
50: Telecom Service (IYZ): #4 (-0.8 pct); This winner only up +1.75 pct YTD
55: Utilities (XLU): #1 (-0.5 pct); From first to last to first.
Bonds: The US Bond market eked out small gains. Interesting how the experts want the Fed to drop rates “because of the economy” – No, it’s because their stocks and bonds are falling.
Commodities: $CRB lost -3.62 (-1.18 pct) W/W because Crude Oil got hammered -4.33/bbl. But, wait, wasn’t there a major drawdown of distillates and gasoline this week? And, when that happens, don’t we usually see sharp price hikes in Crude Oil? Interesting that whenever the US stock market needs to be goosed, the oil price conveniently drops like a stone.
Oil & Gas: $WTIC futures dropped -4.33 (-7.01 pct) W/W to 57.44, after nine straight weeks on the plus side. Those OPEC Ministers must be fraidy-cats. NOT! I suspect there was Fed/Aministration intervention. It could be simply profit-taking, but why take profits in $USD-priced oil when the $USD is getting hammered?
Gold: The Precious Metals made some headway after Friday’s gains on the back of a rapidly falling $USD. Base metals were stronger again this week, and traders are asking if just four companies (BHP, Rio Tinto, Xstrata and CVRD) are now sufficiently powerful and aggressive to squeeze the shorts. Tin, Nickel and Copper zoomed.
Goldminers: Mixed performance again although Friday was a good day. I think that if and when gold starts trading comfortably in the 650-700 range in the next few days and weeks, the miners will pick up strength.
Forex: The $USD took some heavy losses this week, dropping -1.23 pct to close at 83.21. With the Bank of Japan’s fiscal year to end March 31, there is widespread discussion that the carry trade will be winding down, thereby putting upward pressure on the Yen. The tightening by the People’s Bank of China this week also ought to put more stress on the $USD.
Economic calendar for next week.
A week ago, I wrote, “The focus is returning to inflation.” Central banks around the world have a need to raise up their key lending rates, but the Fed is between a rock and a hard place. Yes, this is a classic case of stagflation, which, unless resolved, will ultimately take down equity prices, and keep bond prices from rallying, which is the usual kick-off for the next Bull market in stocks.
Cara Stock Watch
It strikes me that rallies in stock prices are becoming ever more selective, and for the most part are able to take current prices only back to falling 50-day Moving Average lines at which point there is more selling.
Here are the Cara 100 gainers on Friday.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List gainers
Here are the top Cara 100 losers for Friday.
Interactive chart of the top 12 Watch List losers (Interactive link)
RIMM is now out of the Cara 100, which will be the Cara 99 until I find a replacement.
Sector ETF Review
The tables I show are for ten Sector Index Funds (ETF’s) only.
As for this week’s prices, of the ten sector ETF’s I follow here, only 1 of 10 (XLU) was up this week. XLU is the only one up over four weeks too, but barely.
The following table is sorted by price performance Week over Week (W/W), i.e. 1W%N.
Table 1: Cara ETF List
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
You can do this table yourself by entering the following string into the Summary window at Billcara2.com and then clicking on the link for Performance. XLE XLB XLI XLY XLP IYH XLF SMH IYZ XLU . You can also add more ETF’s – up to 30 in total.
For a list of components to any ETF, simply go to the AMEX.com web site, and click on ETF’s. I do that frequently because the list of ETF’s growing incredibly fast.
10 (energy: XLE)

15 (basic materials: XLB)

20 (industrial: XLI)

25 (consumer discretionary: XLY)

30 (consumer staples: XLP)

35 (healthcare: IYH)

40 (financial: XLF)

45 (technology, semiconductor: SMH)

50 (telecom: IYZ)

55 (utilities: XLU)

Sector 10 (energy: XLE, IYE, VDE, OIH, PBW and IXC)
This week, XLE lost -1.76 pct to 56.39. $WTIC (Crude futures) lost -4.33/bbl (-7.01 pct) to $57.44.
The inventory drawdown in distillates and gasoline was significant. The winter storm in the northeast was significant. The OPEC Ministers in session was significant. But, somehow, the price collapsed.
I think it started in Texas.

Here’s the XLE Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLE Monthly data:

XLE Weekly data:

XLE Daily data:

XLE Hourly data:

Table 2: Senior oil & gas equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
For my general view of Big Oil, please turn to my assessment of (Cara 100) Exxon Mobil in the Dow 30 Value Line reports commentary near the end of this WIR. Hint: it’s not very positive.
I continue to believe that Crude Oil ($WTIC) will stay in a trading range between 55 and 65 for the near future. A serious recession could take the price below that trading range, but not for more than one or two quarters I believe.
The Oil Refiners still look interesting, relatively speaking, particularly when oil trades at the low end of its trading range. Two names that Citi likes are Sunoco Inc (SUN) and Valero Energy (VLO) for reasons of (i) margin dynamics and (ii) multiple new projects coming on-stream in 2007.
SUN (65.90) and VLO (60.01) hit cycle lows in Sept and Jan with RSI-7’s down at 30. With the Weekly RSI-7 now at 58.8 and 69.6 respectively, the price has gotten away.
But the next cycle low where the Weekly-Daily RSI-7 is down to about 30 for SUN and VLO, I’d be a buyer of both. You might even see the stocks down to 56 and 48 respectively at that point.
Citi has 12-month Price Targets (PT) of 85 and 71 for each. If you catch the 56 and 48 prices, and sell at those PT’s, that would mean a Return (excluding dividends) of +52 pct and +48 pct respectively.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -Canada
The Canadian energy stocks got whacked: IMO -5.2 pct, ECA -4.1 pct, SU -4.0 pct. PetroBrasil (PBR) was also hit -4.5 pct.
Sector 15 (basic materials: IYM, XLB, IGE and VAW)
The Basic Materials ETF (XLB) was again the 2nd best ETF performer out of 10. XLB lost -0.56 pct W/W after dropping -0.93 pct on Friday. XLB closed at 37.10.
Here’s the XLB Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLB Monthly data:

XLB Weekly data:

XLB Daily data:

XLB Hourly data:

Table 3: Senior metals and steel equities:
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
The jury is still out as to whether or not the Fed intends to continue pumping liquidity into the economy at the excessive rate it has been. That will be the biggest determinant of prices in this sector.
As for this week, huge miner BHP was up +2.9 pct, but many of the steels suffered a sell-off. Tenaris was down -6.4 pct, Mittal and Nucor each dropped -4.1 pct W/W.
The extra TS price drop was probably linked to the -7 pct loss in Crude Oil because they supply the oil drillers and pipelines with tube steel.
Sector 20 (industrial: IYJ, XLI, VIS, and IYT)
The Industrials and Transport sector ETF (XLI), aka capital goods producers, was down -0.56 pct W/W to close at 35.25.
Here’s the XLI Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLI Monthly data:

XLI Weekly data:

XLI Daily data:

XLI Hourly data:

Table 4 Senior capital goods makers and transportation:
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
With the Dow Transports moving up over 5000, Colin Twiggs opined a month ago, “The Dow Transports have confirmed the primary Bull market.” Three weeks ago, he was starting to look at technical support levels at 4500 for a possible Bear case. Then two weeks ago, the 5000 support level was easily smashed as global markets cratered.
I have opined all along that I no longer consider the Dow Transports (led by international powerhouse Fedex) to be a significant Dow Theory indicator. The world economy has changed. Besides, I have said, I think FDX shares were used as an instrument by the Bulls to in a sense prove their Bull case (ie, in another sense, to mislead the public).
Fedex (FDX) was hammered this week (-3.1 pct). The very long-term rising trend line appears to have been pierced on the downside.

UPS (-1.94 pct W/W) has been a dog since December when I believe the Bulls started pushing FDX as the “bellwhether”. And, UPS is sitting on a very very long-term support of 66. A break below 66 will set off a wave of selling in the Industrials (GICS 20), I believe. In fact I believe UPS and FDX have to both be considered bellwhethers of economic strength or weakness, particularly in North America and Europe.

Sector 25 (consumer discretionary: XLY, IYC and VCR)
The Consumer Discretionary sector ETF (XLY) was down 2.46 pct W/W to close at 37.32.
Just a week ago, I suggested after a single week of recovery, that, “Now technicians will be looking to see if a rising price can take the sector back up through the 50-day (10-week) Moving Average (39.09)” I guess not.
If consumers are facing inflated bills/cost of living, and they are in debt and digging into savings at a rate not seen for generations, and their home equity is no longer available as a personal ATM, I somehow add the evidence to a conclusion that XLY is going either sideways or down.
Here’s the XLY Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLY Monthly data:

XLY Weekly data:

XLY Daily data:

XLY Hourly data:

Table 5: Senior consumer discretionary equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
A week ago, I wrote, “The gains by Brunswick (BC) +3.5 pct, Toyota (TM) +3.1 pct, and Nike (NKE) and JC Penny (JCP) +1.9 pct hardly qualify as a recovery.” I guess you were listening because this week, Brunswick (BC) -5.1 pct, Toyota (TM) -2.4 pct, and JC Penny (JCP) -1.1 pct got whacked. NKE was up +1.5 pct W/W only after jumping +1.7 pct on Friday.
Sector 30 (consumer staples: XLP, VDC, RTH and IYK)
The Consumer Staples sector ETF (XLP) dropped -1.11 pct W/W to close at $25.93. The loss on Friday was -0.77 pct.
Here's the XLP Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLP Monthly data:

XLP Weekly data:

XLP Daily data:

XLP Hourly data:

Table 6: Senior consumer staples equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
Our case study, Whole Foods Market (WFMI) dropped another -3.9 pct and Wal-Mart (WMT) dipped -2.6 pct W/W.
For some reason, Walgreen (WAG) was up +3.8 pct on the week. The Edward Jones analyst says it has something to do with “contractual alliances” following the $27 billion merger of CVS Corp (CVS) and Caremark Rx (CMX).
But, isn’t that another word for “price fixing”?
As for WMT, I find it interesting that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) chairman applauded the Wal-Mart management decision to not go full-out into banking like Volkswagen AG (VLKAY), Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) and Target Corp. (TGT).
Give me a break! What risk did the FDIC have if Wal-Mart became a national bank other than the chairman having to listen to the anti-competitor screams from oligopolist Humungous Bank & Broker?
I guess these people think if it’s ok for HBB, then it’s ok for America. But I think my money would be safer in Wal-Mart than in some of those small town banks that may have over played the Sub-prime mortgage card.
Sector 35 (healthcare: IYH, XLV, VHT, IXJ, and IBB)
The IYH healthcare ETF dropped -1.22 pct W/W to close at 65.77.
Here’s the IYH Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
IYH Monthly data:

IYH Weekly data:

IYH Daily data:

IYH Hourly data:

Table 7: Senior healthcare equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
JNJ and AMGN each dropped -2.6 pct on the week. NVS was up +1.5 pct. Nothing much going on here.
My corticosteroids came from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and my doctor didn’t even know that’s a Cara 100 company. (LOL)
An even bigger laugh is that I purchased those GSK drugs at noon on Wed the 14th – when the stock hit a low. It’s called helping one another. (LOL)

Sector 40 (financial: IYG, IYF, XLF, VFH, IXG, VNQ, RWR, IYR, and ICF)
The Financials ETF (XLF) dropped -2.37 pct W/W to close at 35.02. That’s the 2nd worst performer this week and the worst over the past four weeks.
Do you recall me saying something a few weeks back about getting the customers to line up deck chairs on the Titanic, while the Bankers were busy operating the lifeboats?
Yes, it is important to watch the loan loss provisions, and the margin calls, and the litigation, of the big banks from this point on.
I think you want to watch the stock performance of the top-rated “Gold”man Sachs (GS).

Is the GS Weekly RSI now going to roll over at a much lower cycle high? Is any rally here going to stop at the falling Moving Average lines?
Here’s the XLF Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLF Monthly data:

XLF Weekly data:

XLF Daily data:

XLF Hourly data:

Table 8: Senior financial company equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
A week ago I wrote, “The LEH, MS and GS stocks put on a brave face, recovering with gains of +5.2 pct, +3.5 pct and +3.1 pct respectively. But, even with these sizeable gains, over four weeks LEH, MS and GS are still down -10.2 pct, -8.2 pct, and -5.7 pct respectively.”
Things got worse this week. But isn’t it wondrous that the rally cry of the Bulls last week was that HBB was buying up those devastated Sub-Prime Mortgage companies? Did that story comfort you? NOT!
Yes, it was the litigators employed by HBB that started the whole fiasco. Kick them while they are down. Kinda reminded me of the old days when HBB sent out margin calls in a Bear market only to have their prop trading desk pick the babies out of the bathwater.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Anyway, after four weeks, LEH, MS and GS have lost -14.5 pct, -10.2 pct and -8.2 pct respectively. I wonder how many HBB insiders who are issuing Buy recommendations to clients today are actually also selling stock in their Friends & Family accounts?
I wonder if HBB compliance actually checks on that?
Sector 45 (technology: IGM, IGV, IGW, XLK, VGT, IYW, IGN, IXN, MTK and SMH)
This week SMH dropped -1.50 pct to close at 34.09. Friday was half the loss.
Boy, hasn’t SMH been a dog’s breakfast for several years? No matter, when the next great Bull market starts, SMH will probably be a leader.
Alternatively; when SMH comes out of the doldrums, get set for fast markets across the fleet.
Here’s the SMH Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
SMH Monthly data:

SMH Weekly data:

SMH Daily data:

SMH Hourly data:

Table 9: Senior technology equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
ADSK this week was down a further –3.0 pct, which makes it -12.2 pct over four weeks. Only (Cara 100) InfoSys (INFY -14.1 pct) is worse, and that happened after plunging -5.2 pct this week.
INFY enjoyed a terrific 2H06 and early part of the year, but it’s an India-based company, which tends to make the share trading more volatile. INFY got whacked in the past few weeks, and there is now the long-term Moving Average line of support to consider. If that doesn’t hold, it would be a further signal of market weakness to come.
Following a Bear market, INFY will be a leading pick of mine.

Intel (INTC) gained a little this week (+0.3 pct) to 19.15, but the four-week performance is still a sad -10.1 pct.
Sector 50 (telecom: IYZ, VOX and IXP)
The U.S. telco sector ETF (IYZ) dropped -0.79 pct W/W, which is not much.
The first leg up in a new Bull market usually shows strength in the regulated telcos and utilities and in the commercial banks.
As I wrote last week, “This time around, however, maybe it’s best to avoid, for a time, the financials that hold defaulting debt.”
I’m avoiding the Telco’s too, for now, but along with the Techs, following a Bear market, I expect them to do well ahead of most the other sectors, particularly the smaller, more aggressive companies with exciting new IP (Internet Protocol) technologies, particularly in video.
AT&T (T) rallied +1.2 pct this week, which actually put it at #1 Dow 30 performer. Verizon (VZ) was, I believe, #10 performer, and lost a bit of ground. Verizon doesn’t have as good a dividend yield.
T looks a bit top-heavy today. It’s had quite a run, and may start to side-track from here. For now, however, I cannot see how the huge dividend yield at T would not protect the stock in a Bear, at least to some extent.

Here’s the IYZ Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
IYZ Monthly data:

IYZ Weekly data:

IYZ Daily data:

IYZ Hourly data:

Sector 55 (utilities: IDU, XLU, and VPU)
The Utilities ETF (XLU) has gone from 1st to last to 1st performer of my ten sector ETF’s.
It will usually do well when bonds do well, as they did this week. That’s because Utility companies hold a lot of bonds on the balance sheet. It’s also because Utility companies typically pay a high dividend to demanding shareholders and when the bond yields go down (and bond prices up), the competition for yield from the income-oriented accounts is not so great.
This week, XLU gained +0.52 pct, to close at 38.40.
Of some concern was Friday when XLU dropped -0.95 pct on the day. That was the day the $USD dropped a lot, after the CPI (and earlier PPI) data came out, indicating an inflation problem. Utilities shareholders don’t like inflation!
Why is that? Regulated entities don’t have pricing power. But they do have rising costs, which rise more quickly during inflation.
Here’s the XLU Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
XLU Monthly data:

XLU Weekly data:

XLU Daily data:

XLU Hourly data:

Bond & Interest Rate Review
US Treasury bonds improved modestly in price as the yields dropped -3, -5, -8, and -7 basis points (bp) to 4.67 pct, 4.52 pct, 4.45 pct and 4.57 pct respectively on the 30-year, 10-year, 5-year and 2-year paper. And, the T-Bill yield dropped from 4.93 pct to 4.87 this week, which is a -14 bp move from 5.01 pct in just two weeks, so traders are thinking that the Fed is about to drop rates.
I continue to ask if this rapid decline in T-Bill yields is a signal that traders believe that stock prices are going to fall and the Fed will bail out the equity market or could it be a flight to safety?
On its own, the recently released economic data points (eg, PPI and CPI) do not offer up any rationale for rapidly falling Treasury yields. Hence, if there is any recovery here in stock prices, I expect these yields to move back up – as they did a week ago.
In other words, I do not yet believe that traders are betting on recession and deflation. Metals and precious metals prices lifted this week, and the inflation data that the US govt published on Thursday and Friday shows no let up in the inflation cycle.
Interest rates and bond yields.


Interactive Daily data charts:


Interactive Hourly data charts:


| Maturity | Yield | Yesterday | Last Week | Last Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Month | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.92 | 4.99 |
| 6 Month | 4.89 | 4.88 | 4.90 | 4.92 |
| 2 Year | 4.57 | 4.55 | 4.64 | 4.85 |
| 3 Year | 4.49 | 4.47 | 4.57 | 4.74 |
| 5 Year | 4.45 | 4.44 | 4.53 | 4.70 |
| 10 Year | 4.52 | 4.52 | 4.57 | 4.72 |
| 30 Year | 4.67 | 4.67 | 4.70 | 4.84 |
| Maturity | Yield | Yesterday | Last Week | Last Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2yr AA | 3.50 | 3.47 | 3.48 | 3.63 |
| 2yr AAA | 3.48 | 3.50 | 3.47 | 3.63 |
| 2yr A | 3.65 | 3.65 | 3.56 | 3.61 |
| 5yr AAA | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.66 |
| 5yr AA | 3.46 | 3.46 | 3.59 | 3.58 |
| 5yr A | 3.57 | 3.57 | 3.62 | 3.66 |
| 10yr AAA | 3.63 | 3.63 | 3.63 | 3.78 |
| 10yr AA | 3.59 | 3.60 | 3.58 | 3.76 |
| 10yr A | 3.93 | 3.93 | 3.93 | 4.08 |
| 20yr AAA | 4.18 | 4.13 | 4.14 | 4.16 |
| 20yr AA | 4.48 | 4.05 | 4.07 | 4.02 |
| 20yr A | 4.08 | 4.02 | 3.99 | 4.13 |
| Maturity | Yield | Yesterday | Last Week | Last Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2yr AA | 4.96 | 4.94 | 4.98 | 5.12 |
| 2yr A | 4.98 | 4.97 | 5.02 | 5.18 |
| 5yr AAA | 4.93 | 4.91 | 4.99 | 5.12 |
| 5yr AA | 5.05 | 5.03 | 5.08 | 5.19 |
| 5yr A | 5.06 | 5.04 | 5.09 | 5.24 |
| 10yr AAA | 5.14 | 5.12 | 5.18 | 5.45 |
| 10yr AA | 5.38 | 5.36 | 5.42 | 5.47 |
| 10yr A | 5.42 | 5.40 | 5.44 | 5.52 |
| 20yr AAA | 5.81 | 5.75 | 5.75 | 5.76 |
| 20yr AA | 5.68 | 5.68 | 6.30 | 5.84 |
| 20yr A | 5.95 | 5.89 | 5.89 | 5.89 |
Interactive Chart of Interest rates and bond yields.
TLT and AGG had modest gains this week of +0.51 pct and +0.35 pct.
Fannie (FNM) (-3.2 pct), Freddie (FRE) (-4.0 pct) and Countrywide Financial (CFC) (-3.2 pct W/W), along with the broad Financial sector (XLF) (-2.4 pct), all were hit hard as traders started to realize that the housing and mortgage market problems are greater than just in the Sub-prime area.
US Bond Funds -- Interactive Monthly Data Charts
SHY Monthly data series chart:
IEF Monthly data series chart:
TLT Monthly data series chart:
AGG Monthly data series chart:
LQD Monthly data series chart:
TIP Monthly data series chart:
US Bond Funds -- Interactive Weekly Data Charts
SHY Weekly data series chart:
IEF Weekly data series chart:
TLT Weekly data series chart:
AGG Weekly data series chart:
LQD Weekly data series chart:
TIP Weekly data series chart:
It’s possible that stocks and bonds will now start to trade countercyclically, ie, as bonds fall, stocks rally or as bonds rally, stocks fall.
US Bond Funds -- Interactive Daily Data Charts
SHY Daily data series chart:
IEF Daily data series chart:
TLT Daily data series chart:
AGG Daily data series chart:
LQD Daily data series chart:
TIP Daily data series chart:
US Bond Funds -- Interactive Hourly Data Charts
SHY Hourly data series chart:
IEF Hourly data series chart:
TLT Hourly data series chart:
AGG Hourly data series chart:
LQD Hourly data series chart:
TIP Hourly data series chart:
Table 11: Interest-sensitive securities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
I’m thinking that with CFC, FRE and FNM continuing their descent, the issue has more to do with accounting provisions for loan losses than with interest rates.
Consumer Finance -USA -- Interactive Weekly Data Charts
Consumer Finance -USA -- Interactive Daily Data Charts
Consumer Finance -USA -- Interactive Hourly Data Charts
Somebody asked if it was time to buy Countrywide Financial (CFC). I think CFC was good for a short-term trade on Tuesday after the Weekly and Daily RSI-7 dipped below 30. But not now.
Today the Monthly-Weekly-Daily RSI-7 for CFC is 40.7/24.9/38.5. Before buying CFC, I first want to see all three values below the 30 line and the Daily and Hourly numbers on the rebound. I’d also feel better if FNM and FRE was in similar territory.
As for the Talking Heads at that point, I could not care less. In fact, if the RSI numbers are in the Accumulation Zone, I frankly don’t give a darn what anybody says or writes.
Commodities Review
The Commodities Index ($CRB) dropped this week -3.62 (-1.18 pct), closing at 304.44. As metals and precious metals lifted a bit; the damage was in the energy sector, mostly in Crude Oil ($WTIC down -7.0 pct).
There could be a rally in $CRB, but I continue to believe that the “Weekly and Daily charts of the $CRB look awfully much like any rally would be headed off by a falling MA line at about 316.”
Also, as I wrote a week or two ago, “The cycle high and low is 316.40 and 303.99. If $CRB drops below 303, that would be a negative for the commodity players.” We’re awfully close now.
I also incorrectly opined at the time that “If Crude Oil drops back under 60, I believe that $CRB would fall below the current 50-Day MA (300.80).”
Maybe it takes more than a day or two of Oil being below 60 before $CRB sets a new Daily cycle low (below 303). Let’s watch this index early in the week.
Interactive Chart of Weekly CRB Commodities Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily CRB Commodities Index:

Oil:
After a string of weekly wins, $WTIC finally pulled back. Was it mere profit taking or were traders not impressed by the friendly talk of the OPEC Oil Ministers this week, as they seemed to be saying that 55 Oil would be ok with them.
West Texas Intermediate Crude ($WTIC) dropped a lot from 61.77 to 57.44, which is a loss of -7.01 pct W/W.
The 50-Day Moving Average (from StockCharts) is now 57.77, while the 200-Day MA is 64.34. Hence the current price (57.44) is below the 50-day MA (57.77), and well below the 200-day MA, which is technically bearish.
Interactive Chart of Weekly Crude Oil:

Interactive Chart of Daily Crude Oil:

Gold:
Two weeks ago, $GOLD was smashed -42.60/oz (-6.20 pct). This week it was $WTIC -4.33/bbl (-7.01 pct). Could it be that the market is ignoring the rising inflation data (PPI/CPI this week) and looking ahead to the deflationary forces of a recession?
You always have to consider all possible market drivers. That way if you are wrong, you can see yourself beating your head against the wall each week.
I say no to deflation, but if $CRB falls to below 300, and $WTIC falls below 55, and $GOLD falls below its 200-day MA (around 624), then I have to say that I can only bounce my head off the wall so many times before I have to admit to pain. So, I watch these signs.
This week, $GOLD managed to eke out a small $1.90 gain (+0.29 pct) because of a big day Friday (+1.05 pct), to close at 653.90.
The 50day MA is now at 651.37 and the more important 200day MA is at 624.74. So technically $GOLD is bullish. That means $GOLD is forecasting inflation, not deflation.
I do not think the bullish PM cycle is over, but if central banks have agreed to start tightening around the world, and there are signs they have (see Dr. Joe’s [Zhou Xiaochuan is Governor] People's Bank of China this week), that would serve to hurt the Precious Metals.
Then again, any excessive tightening action by multiple central banks would kill the global equity market, which would lead to more money printing, leading to more inflation down the road.
These are nervous times for Gold traders, but as long as the $USD remains in a downtrend and the $XEU (Euro) is in rally mode, then I believe that $GOLD is headed higher.
On Friday, $XEU bumped +0.6 pct on the day and $GOLD responded nicely.
Interactive Chart of Weekly Gold EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily Gold EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive chart of recent trading for the Gold Bullion index.
A week ago I opined that with the $USD in a downtrend, I could see $SILVER would soon be trading over 13. This week, $SILVER gained +1.89 pct to close at 13.22.
The gain on Friday alone was +1.1 pct.
The 50-day MA is 13.37 (so the current price at 13.22 is still technically short-term negative) and the 200-day MA is 12.33 (so the case is Bullish). It appears to me that any resistance put up by the 50-day MA line could be taken out in a small rally this week.
Interactive Chart of Weekly Silver EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily Silver EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive chart of the Silver Bullion index.
$PLAT gained 16.90 (+1.40 pct) W/W to 1224.90. Please note that 1229.10 was the most recent cycle high, so a new cycle high could be set this week.
The 50-Day MA for $PLAT is now 1193.20 and the 200-Day MA is 1185.95.
Interactive Chart of Weekly Platinum EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily Platinum EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive chart of the Platinum metal index.
$PALL dropped -3.65 (-1.03 pct) W/W to close at 351.78. That’s disappointing because I like to see all four of the PM complex move higher in sync.
The 50-day and 200-day Moving Averages for $PALL are 346.92 and 331.63 respectively, which is below the current price, which means palladium is still technically bullish.
There has been a bullish pattern here since early October (290.88).
Interactive Chart of Weekly Palladium EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily Palladium EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive chart of the Palladium metal index.
Base metals have been very strong. I believe that the four major metal miners are squeezing the market. There was some huge debt underwritings needed to support their take-overs in the past year, and I believe the miners now want their “piece”.
$COPPER a week ago gained 7.70 (+2.84 pct). This week $COPPER gained 22.70 (+8.15 pct) W/W to close at 301.10.
Was this a price response to global economic expansion where demand outstrips supply or rather a withdrawal of offers by the major miners? I think the latter, in which case this trend might persist.
The 50-day MA for $COPPER is 264.74, and the 200-Day MA is 316.60. Can the current price (301.10) surpass the 200-day MA soon? Well, it’s only $15 away and these contracts jumped +22.70 this week alone.
A week ago, I wrote, “There was a February low of 238.50, and a high of 290.00, with a subsequent high of 287.40. It looks like that 290.00 price has to be taken out in a rally before I’d start thinking $COPPER is bullish. But that resistance level is just $12 away.”
Bingo! $COPPER is undeniably bullish as the two previous cycle highs were easily taken out this week.
Interactive Chart of Weekly Copper EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily Copper EOD Continuous Contract Index:

Interactive chart of the Copper metal index.
Table 12: Senior gold equities
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
The gold stocks and the base metal stocks suffered huge losses two weeks ago and were flat last week. This week, there was a rally of sorts. The least we can say is that these stocks are basing.
To watch the moves in precious metal miners, you will have to monitor the individual stock charts, preferably in real-time, as follows:
NEM ABX AU GFI GG HMY AUY KGC BVN
Interactive 15-minute data
Interactive 60-minute data
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
MDG LIHRY AEM BGO IAG EGO RGLD GOLD CDE GRS
Interactive 15-minute data
Interactive 60-minute data
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
CBJ SSRI SIL NG KRY UXG GRZ TSE_HRG TSE_GUY TSE_AGI
Interactive 15-minute data
Interactive 60-minute data
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
NXG GSS MNG DROOY MFN RNO RANGY MRB CLG
Interactive 15-minute data
Interactive 60-minute data
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
Here are the key Silver miners and the SLV ETF:
SLV SIL CDE HL PAAS SSRI SLW MGN
Interactive 15-minute data
Interactive 60-minute data
Interactive Daily data
Interactive Weekly data
$XAU, GDX and (TSE’s) XGD were +0.96 pct, +1.42 pct, and +0.40 pct, respectively. Friday was a big day.
The $XAU index closed at 133.31. The 50d-MA (136.95) and 200d-MA (137.39) are above the current price for the 3rd consecutive week, which means that the PM stocks are still technically bearish, but perhaps starting to recover.
Here are the Weekly and Daily Data charts of the indexes:
Interactive Chart of Weekly U.S. Goldminers Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily U.S. Goldminers Index:

The U.S. goldminer share trust ETF trades under the ticker symbol GDX.
Here are the U.S. Goldminer ETF (GDX) index Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:
GDX Weekly data:

GDX Daily data:

GDX Hourly data:

The Toronto Exchange-listed goldminer iUnits S&P/TSX Capped Gold Index ETF trades under the ticker symbol TSE:XGD.
Here are the Weekly and Daily data charts for the TSX Goldshares (XGD) index:
Interactive Chart of XGD Weekly data:

Interactive Chart of XGD Daily data:

Forex Review
The $USD closed at 83.27, a loss of -1.04 (-1.23 pct) W/W, which is relatively big loss in one week. The $USD 50-Day MA is now 84.46, and the 200-Day MA is 85.07, so the current price (83.27) is technically quite bearish.
Apparently the unwinding of the Japanese carry trade by large fund managers through the end of the March fiscal year will continue to stress the $USD.
The following data requires your attention: M3 update as of the past week.
M3 is growing at an excessive rate in order to pay for a war and for govt deficits not matched by taxes.
Interactive Chart of Weekly U.S. Dollar Index:

Interactive Chart of Daily U.S. U.S. Dollar Index:

The Euro (priced in USD) had a very big week, gaining +1.99 (+1.52 pct W/W), closing at 133.12.
The $XEU 50-Day MA is 130.62, and the 200-Day MA is 128.66, so the current price (133.12) is technically quite bullish.
In recent weeks, I opined, “I’d still like to see the Euro move up through the December high of 132.55 before I feel quite comfortable in holding such an over-weighted position in precious metals. But, I still expect that to happen soon.”
Bingo!
Interactive Chart of Weekly Euro Dollar Index, priced in USD:

Interactive Chart of Daily Euro Dollar Index, priced in USD:

The British Pound gained +0.94 (+0.49 pct W/W) to close at 194.17.
The $XBP 50-Day MA is 195.30, and the 200-Day MA is 190.44, so the current price (194.17) is technically bullish in the long-term, but not short-term. This week’s rally stemmed the losses against the $USD for the past couple weeks.
Weekly British Pound Index:

Daily British Pound Index:

The Japanese Yen had another significant rally against the $USD (ater the one two weeks ago), which saw a gain of +1.01 (+1.19 pct W/W) to close Friday at 85.68. This is a new short-term cycle high.
“Traders who are short the Yen are very nervous here.” Same old; same old.
The 50-Day MA is 83.57, and the 200-Day MA is 85.21, so the current price (85.68) is now both short-term and long-term bullish.
Weekly Japanese Yen Index:

Daily Japanese Yen Index:

Weekly Canadian Dollar Index:

Daily Canadian Dollar Index:

The Canadian Dollar lost -0.27 (-0.32 pct W/W) to close at 85.08 on Friday.
The $CDW 50-Day MA is 85.15, and the 200-Day MA is 87.81, so the current price (85.08) is bearish. A recovery in the price of Oil will likely be necessary to improve the Loonie’s outlook. Also, the Cdn economy has slowed rapidly after the US housing and mortgage industry issues became apparent because many Cdn exporters (wood and building materials) serve that industry.
The lower Loonie ought to help with Cdn tourism this summer.
International Equities Review
The international markets had another serious decline this week. The Indian ETF (IFN) lost -3.76 pct. The Templeton Russia Fund was down -2.45 pct. The China FXI dropped -1.26 pct W/W.
These markets have been technically weak since the start of the year.
Asia-Pacific indices (Interactive link)
European indices (Interactive link)
Table 13: International equities perspective
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
Japanese equity market ETF: EWJ
Japan’s EWJ (which is a USD-denominated NYSE-traded ETF) lost -1.91 pct W/W to 14.41. The Nikkei 225 dropped from 17164 to 16744 (-2.45 pct).
Three weeks ago, I opined that, “The EWJ … current price (15.04) is bullish, but over-heated.” Now the pull-back is -4.2 pct.
As Colin Twiggs says, the long-term technical target of 21000 seems a long way off from the present 16744.
Here is the Japanese (EWJ) equity market ETF Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:



U.K. equity market ETF: EWU
The FTSE 100 of the UK dropped from 6245 to 6130 (-1.84 pct) while the EWU (UK market ETF trading in the US in USD) dropped -1.46 pct.
Here is the United Kingdom (EWU) equity market ETF Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:

EWU Daily data:


Canadian equity market ETF: EWC
EWC (priced in USD) had a loss of -2.04 pct W/W to close Friday at 24.96, which gets the ETF back exactly to where it had been two weeks ago.
Here is the Canadian (EWC) equity market ETF Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly data charts:



(Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore)
(U.K., Germany, France, Italy)
(Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Australia).
U.S. Equities Review
All broad indexes in the US stock market fell a little this week. The higher beta Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 small cap indexes dropped -0.62 pct and -0.81 pct respectively, while the usually more staid S&P 500 and Dow 30 dropped -1.13 pct and -1.35 pct W/W.
General Motors (GM -5.9 pct) was enough on its own to sink the Dow 30 a little more than the others.
I received a letter from the Elliott Wave marketing people this week that opened with something like, “Although you don’t care for our work, etc… we’d like to discuss opportunities, etc”. The point is I do like the Elliott Wave fibonacci work; it’s just that I shudder at how far some of these systems go to create a marketing image that they have the answers that traders need.
I believe a precise number can be precisely wrong, and I have watched early in my career far too many professionals destroy their careers by their blind faith pursuit of some of these technical systems.
Colin Twiggs on the other hand is doing what I have learned to do, which is to look at a multiplicity of indicators in order to think probabilities of trends and cycles persisting. The analysis of risk-reward is as much subjective as it is objective, ie, as much art as it is science.
The best financed F-1 racecar teams can engineer the best car and hire the best drivers, but winning the race also comes down to having a good “feel” for the car and the track, and avoiding the accidents.
That’s why I spend so much time on the Week In Review – every week is a new race, a new track, a different set of weather circumstances, a car that needs to be set up appropriately. At the end of the day, I am trying to get a feel for what it will take me to win the following week’s race.
As I see it, Elliott Wave is like considering the air pressure of my tires – just one of 100 or more factors – albeit an important one – in winning the race.
Now, that’s not picking on Elliott Wave because, as I say, I like the principles behind their system.
Here is the Monthly data chart of the Interactive Chart of Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.
Here is the Weekly data chart of the Interactive Chart of Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.
Here is the Daily data chart of the Interactive Chart of Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.
Here is the Hourly data chart of the Interactive Chart of Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500, Dow30, and Russell 2000 (small cap) indexes.
Table 14: Dow 30 List
| Symbol | Close | 1Day Change |
1Day %Change |
1W %Change |
2W %Change |
4W %Change |
YTD %Change |
3M %Change |
6M %Change |
12M %Change |
You can do this table yourself by entering the following string into the Summaries window at www.billcara2.com and then clicking on the link for Performance.
AA AIG AXP BA C CAT DD DIS GE GM HD HON HPQ IBM INTC JNJ JPM KO MCD MMM MO MRK MSFT PFE PG T UTX VZ WMT XOM
Here are the links to interactive Dow charts from Billcara2.com that I broke into groups of ten, which you can add technical indicators for as well. (list one) (list two) (list three)
Dow 30 comments:
The report from Value Line this week is on the Big Daddy of the Dow, Exxon Mobil (XOM), which has the largest market cap of all public companies (over $400 billion).
(XOM: Value Line Report Mar. 16: next one is due Jun. 15)
Exxon Mobil has long been a Cara 100 company because of (i) its financial strength (ii) industry leadership (iii) operating margins and returns on shareholders’ equity and on total capital invested. The problem I have today is that XOM has represented dead money for five months and is likely to produce less than attractive Annual Total Returns for the next 3 to 5 years.
You see, the current quarter (1Q07) will undoubtedly be the peak earnings quarter in the Bull phase that started in 2002. From next quarter onwards, the quarterly earnings are likely to decline Y/Y.
Exxon Mobil is the greatest cash-cow in the history of the corporate world and the company has decided to use that cash in ways that make it appear that the current and future periods are better than they actually are. Through a return of capital via extra dividends and share buy-backs, the Return on Shareholder Equity is a pumped figure.
Traders are not ignorant of this window dressing, so the average annual PE multiple has dropped from the mid-teens to about 10. That’s reasonable.
Also, Value Line forecasts the cash flow per share for 2007 at $8.30/share. Their graph shows a solid line representing 9 times cash flow and the share price falling below that. In a Bear market, however, these big oil companies can often be bought at six times cash flow, which in the case of XOM would be about $50.
Given that the stock is presently trading at about $70, could it drop $20 or about -29 pct from here?
Let’s say the 2007 dividend for XOM is $1.40, that represents, on a $50 handle, a dividend yield of +2.8 pct, which would be ok, but not superb. So, unless interest rates crater immediately (ie, highly unlikely), I don’t think the dividend yield is going to protect XOM from a Bear.
In the previous Bear, XOM dropped from a peak of about 50 to a low of about 30, which is a drop of -40 pct. If, in the next Bear, XOM drops from a high of 79 to 50, that would be a drop of -36.7 pct from peak to trough, which compares.
So, what I am doing here is pointing out that stock prices fall as well as rise – even for the biggest and best managed companies.
Value Line gives you a reason: they estimate full-year earnings at $6.55 for 2006, $6.05 for 2007 and $5.95 for 2008. They forecast a drop-off of total revenues and an increase in reserve replacement, production and operating costs. The boom times (2002-2007) are, in a word, over.
Part of the reason that XOM shares managed to hit a record $79 high in 4Q06 was the result of the $30 billion stock buy-back. I always find it amazing that these mega-cap companies always seem to buy their stock at the top of the cycle. Unlike the average trader, however, I’m not afraid to call a spade a spade. I think these trades are set-ups for Friends & Family.
Of course, crude oil prices could possibly go to $80 or $100, but that’s another story.
I am also getting you prepared to buy when stocks of sound companies come to you at attractive prices (ie, Accumulation Zone), and to sell when they are over-bought (ie, in the Distribution Zone).
In November and December 2006, XOM shares hit their Distribution Zone. The price of the stock was in the upper 70’s. The Monthly-Weekly-Daily RSI-7 values (see attached charts) were well above the 70 line and peaking. That’s when you should have sold XOM.
Presently the M-W-D RSI-7 values are 53.6/33.5/33.2. The share price has fallen from 79 to 69.86, which is a loss to shareholders of about $60 billion. In a few months perhaps, the share price will fall another $10 or $20, which will be a loss of a further $100 – 115 billion.
Do you know what this loss means within the concept of the “wealth effect”? It’s devastating. And this – albeit the biggest market cap – is just a single stock.
And where do you think the RSI-7 values are likely to be when XOM hits a multi-year cycle low of say $50? Yes, those RSI-7’s will be under 30 across the board, which will be the Accumulation Zone.
And, then, when the world is talking about crude oil falling to $30 and the economy going into depression, you ignore that talk, and you buy XOM. And when you buy the stock, the PE will be somewhere around 8.3, the cash flow per share will be down at 6, and the dividend yield will be about 2.8 pct – maybe higher – and you can relax.
Alcoa [GICS 15, Dow 30]
(AA: Yahoo Finance file)
(AA: StockChart chart)
(AA: Billcara2 chart)
(AA: ADVFN Financial Data)
(AA: Value Line Report Jan. 19: next one is due Apr. 20)
Altria Group Inc [GICS 30, Dow 30]
(MO: Yahoo Finance file)
(MO: StockChart chart)
(MO: Billcara2 chart)
(MO: ADVFN Financial Data)
(MO: Value Line Report Feb. 2: next one is due May. 4)
American International Group [GICS 40, Dow 30]
(AIG: Yahoo Finance file)
(AIG: StockChart chart)
(AIG: Billcara2 chart)
(AIG: ADVFN Financial Data)
(AIG: Value Line Report Feb. 23: next one is due May 25)
American Express [GICS 40, Dow 30]
(AXP: Yahoo Finance file)
(AXP: StockChart chart)
(AXP: Billcara2 chart)
(AXP: ADVFN Financial Data)
(AXP: Value Line Report Feb. 23: next one is due May 25)
AT&T [GICS 50, Dow 30]
(T: Yahoo Finance file)
(T: StockChart chart)
(T: Billcara2 chart)
(T: ADVFN Financial Data)
(T: Value Line Report Dec. 29: next one is due Mar. 30)
Boeing Co [GICS 20, Dow 30. Cara 100]
(BA: Yahoo Finance file)
(BA: StockChart chart)
(BA: Billcara2 chart)
(BA: ADVFN Financial Data)
(BA: Value Line Report Dec. 22: next one is due Mar. 23)
Caterpillar [GICS 20, Dow 30]
(CAT: Yahoo Finance file)
(CAT: StockChart chart)
(CAT: Billcara2 chart)
(CAT: ADVFN Financial Data)
(CAT: Value Line Report Jan. 26: next one is due Apr. 27)
Citigroup [GICS 40, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(C: Yahoo Finance file)
(C: StockChart chart)
(C: Billcara2 chart)
(C: ADVFN Financial Data)
(C: Value Line Report Feb. 23: next one is due May 25)
Coca Cola [GICS 30, Dow 30]
(KO: Yahoo Finance file)
(KO: StockChart chart)
(KO: Billcara2 chart)
(KO: ADVFN Financial Data)
(KO: Value Line Report Feb. 2: next one is due May. 4)
Disney [GICS 25, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(DIS: Yahoo Finance file)
(DIS: StockChart chart)
(DIS: Billcara2 chart)
(DIS: ADVFN Financial Data)
(DIS: Value Line Report Feb. 16: next one is due May 18)
Dupont [GICS 15, Dow 30]
(DD: Yahoo Finance file)
(DD: StockChart chart)
(DD: Billcara2 chart)
(DD: ADVFN Financial Data)
(DD: Value Line Report Jan. 19: next one is due Apr. 20)
ExxonMobil [GICS 10, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(XOM: Yahoo Finance file)
(XOM: StockChart chart)
(XOM: Billcara2 chart)
(XOM: ADVFN Financial Data)
(XOM: Value Line Report Mar. 16: next one is due Jun. 15)
General Electric [GICS 20, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(GE: Yahoo Finance file)
(GE: StockChart chart)
(GE: Billcara2 chart)
(GE: ADVFN Financial Data)
(GE: Value Line Report Jan. 12: next one is due Apr. 13)
General Motors [GICS 25, Dow 30]
(GM: Yahoo Finance file)
(GM: StockChart chart)
(GM: Billcara2 chart)
(GM: ADVFN Financial Data)
(GM: Value Line Report Mar. 2: next one is due Jun. 1)
Hewlett-Packard [GICS 45, Dow 30]
(HPQ: Yahoo Finance file)
(HPQ: StockChart chart)
(HPQ: Billcara2 chart)
(HPQ: ADVFN Financial Data)
(HPQ: Value Line Report Jan. 12: next one is due Apr. 13)
Home Depot [GICS 25, Dow 30]
(HD: Yahoo Finance file)
(HD: StockChart chart)
(HD: Billcara2 chart)
(HD: ADVFN Financial Data)
(HD: Value Line Report Jan. 5: next one is due Apr. 6)
Honeywell [GICS 20, Dow 30]
(HON: Yahoo Finance file)
(HON: StockChart chart)
(HON: Billcara2 chart)
(HON: ADVFN Financial Data)
(HON: Value Line Report Jan. 26: next one is due Apr. 27)
IBM [GICS 45, Dow 30]
(IBM: Yahoo Finance file)
(IBM: StockChart chart)
(IBM: Billcara2 chart)
(IBM: ADVFN Financial Data)
(IBM: Value Line Report Jan. 12: next one is due Apr. 13)
Intel [GICS 45, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(INTC: Yahoo Finance file)
(INTC: StockChart chart)
(INTC: Billcara2 chart)
(INTC: ADVFN Financial Data)
(INTC: Value Line Report Jan. 12: next one is due Apr. 13)
Johnson & Johnson [GICS 35, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(JNJ: Yahoo Finance file)
(JNJ: StockChart chart)
(JNJ: Billcara2 chart)
(JNJ: ADVFN Financial Data)
(JNJ: Value Line Report Mar. 2: next one is due Jun. 1)
JP Morgan [GICS 40, Dow 30]
(JPM: Yahoo Finance file)
(JPM: StockChart chart)
(JPM: Billcara2 chart)
(JPM: ADVFN Financial Data)
(JPM: Value Line Report Feb. 23: next one is due May 25)
McDonalds [GICS 30, Dow 30]
(MCD: Yahoo Finance file)
(MCD: StockChart chart)
(MCD: Billcara2 chart)
(MCD: ADVFN Financial Data)
(MCD: Value Line Report Mar. 9: next one is due Jun. 8)
3M Company [GICS 20, Dow 30, Cara 250 June 25-06]
(MMM: Yahoo Finance file)
(MMM: StockChart chart)
(MMM: Billcara2 chart)
(MMM: ADVFN Financial Data)
(MMM: Value Line Report Feb. 16: next one is due May 18)
Merck [GICS 35, Dow 30]
(MRK: Yahoo Finance file)
(MRK: StockChart chart)
(MRK: Billcara2 chart)
(MRK: ADVFN Financial Data)
(MRK: Value Line Report Jan. 19: next one is due Apr. 20)
Microsoft [GICS 45, Dow 30]
(MSFT: Yahoo Finance file)
(MSFT: StockChart chart)
(MSFT: Billcara2 chart)
(MSFT: ADVFN Financial Data)
(MSFT: Value Line Report Feb. 23: next one is due May 25)
Pfizer [GICS 35, Dow 30]
(PFE: Yahoo Finance file)
(PFE: StockChart chart)
(PFE: Billcara2 chart)
(PFE: ADVFN Financial Data)
(PFE: Value Line Report Jan. 19: next one is due Apr. 20)
Procter & Gamble Co. [GICS 30, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(PG: Yahoo Finance file)
(PG: StockChart chart)
(PG: Billcara2 chart)
(PG: ADVFN Financial Data)
(PG: Value Line Report Jan. 5: next one is due Apr. 6)
United Technologies [GICS 20, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(UTX: Yahoo Finance file)
(UTX: StockChart chart)
(UTX: Billcara2 chart)
(UTX: ADVFN Financial Data)
(UTX: Value Line Report Jan. 26: next one is due Apr. 27)
Verizon [GICS 50, Dow 30]
(VZ: Yahoo Finance file)
(VZ: StockChart chart)
(VZ: Billcara2 chart)
(VZ: ADVFN Financial Data)
(VZ: Value Line Report Dec. 29: next one is due Mar. 30)
Wal-Mart [GICS 30, Dow 30, Cara 100]
(WMT: Yahoo Finance file)
(WMT: StockChart chart)
(WMT: Billcara2 chart)
(WMT: ADVFN Financial Data)
(WMT: Value Line Report Feb. 9: next one is due May 11)
Wrap up:
A week ago I wrote that I had “picked up a doozie of a cold at PDAC.” Turns out I got myself run down, which brought on a second round of the pneumonia I had suffered in January and February. This is not something to take lightly, so I will abide by doctors orders and medications. I will stay in bed – with the exception of the WIR of course, and an hour each morning doing the Bull Board.
After I review the notes on PDAC from Jake and Jock, probably today, I’ll publish an article on that. I hoped it would be a lengthy one, but I decided to take it easy for now because I’d like to stick around for a few more years.
For this reason, I asked my book publisher to hold off for two months on the release of the book, which was an easy decision because the manuscript simply is not ready. Close, but not quite there.
Also, any premium reports/newsletters will be held of as well, and I will delay my full-time move to Bahamas to set up a new registered advisory firm and investment fund for the same reason.
The development of BillCara2.com had a bit of a set back this week too as Investertech.com informed me that they were soon going to drop the intra-day (delayed and real-time) data because the securities exchanges and datafeed vendors have goosed their prices beyond reason.
I’d like to find a sponsor for BillCara2.com, but don’t have the time or good health to start looking. The added cost is about $2500/month, which if I break that down into smaller pieces is probably do-able within a small group of advertisers. But I’m not going to underwrite it personally.
David Jackson, btw, is going to allow me to link by ticker symbol anything published on his excellent SeekingAlpha.com blog to individual charts on BillCara2.com.
Too many things happening at one time, unfortunately, which may be a reason my health hasn’t been up to par. This news by Investertech.com is just another hurdle that will take time to clear.
I even have an army of volunteers, but the problem there is that it takes a lot of management time, which I found I don’t have available.
The good news is that my tech associate Steve is getting deeper into an understanding of all these systems, and he has taken control of much of my publisher’s systems as well. So, the back end that you don’t see will come together better for me, enabling me to offload some of the blog/websites/newsletter/mailing list admin work to the publisher’s staff. This is what I needed all along.
Steve, btw, is one of Canada’s leading systems architects. He helped me design and implement major systems at Canaccord and Qtrade Canada. He also designed the original Notley Trend & Cycle system at RBC as well as many enterprise systems for major banks and brokers in Canada.
These projects take time; but, despite a pittance of a budget at our end, ultimately my systems will be working as well as any that HBB use. It’s only a matter of time.
Enjoy your day. Wherever you are in the world, whether its New York, New Toronto, New Delhi or Nassau, I have a feeling we are on the same page.
Posted by Posted by Bill Cara on March 17, 2007 11:11:34 AM | Category: Cara Week in Review
Discourse
Hi everyone.
I think Gold is in a long term (say one year), bull time frame. However, I've shorted it with a week or two time frame objective of a fall in to the 50d moving average (on a weekly chart).
What impact may the recent rate increase by the China Central Bank have, in the Gold price?
Bill, despite the fact that I agree 100% with what you have quoted from Trump and Chavez, you're point about becoming too negative is well taken. Indeed, I think a lot of my troubles in the market last fall were exactly because I was suffering from that mindset. It's something I am on guard against, now.
Ironically, however, I recall a poll from the Kirk Report blog back in February surveying investor outlook. The poll revealed his reader's were overwhelmingly bullish. Even though that was before the 27th, and paradigms may have shifted a bit following the subsequent sell offs, I still believe there's a lot of excess optimism chasing overvalued equities. And my bias remains on the bearish side. I'm just a little less obsessive about it, thanks to you. <8)
Hope you're feeling better. Cheers and thanks once again for providing such a great blog.
Posted by: number2son
at
March 17, 2007 1:43 PM [link]
And please pardon my poor early morning grammar.
Posted by: number2son
at
March 17, 2007 2:26 PM [link]
Bill
Interesting stuff (politics), I borrowed some from your blog. We sure live in interesting times!!
ALOHA !!
Looks like Trump has had it with the Bush/Cheney ticket and the Republicans. He is very popular now mainly due to his TV show, The Apprentice". To be quite frank I think "The Apprentice" is an embarrassment to the US education system and US business. Most of those people are there for their looks and their "game", because if it is based on brains then I am afraid maybe 5 out of 100 on that show have any brains! Here's my plea to "The Donald" ... "Big D ... make those "projects" a lot harder. Doing a logo for Baskin Robbins doen't cut it! Make them invistigate Fannie Mae(FNM). The team that comes away with the most criminal convictions is the winner! Then instead of YOU'RE FIRED you can yell YOU'RE SCREWED! NOW GO-O-O !!!" Okay, who will Trump vote for now that he doesn't like the Republicans? The Democrats? Hillary wants to stay in Iraq ... To me the mentality of a "two party" political system is killing us. I call it a "Two Party Aristocracy" ... In reality it is one party under the King. The King is a conglomerate of BIG BANKS ruled by BIG FAMILIES.
Bill, I have to look around the World and ask one question about the latest "America Bashing" trend ... "Do we deserve it?" I think we do. America's problem in a nutshell is that we have taken on the role as "British Empire 2". The British Empire failed and most miserably in the Middle East and especially in Iraq. The way to rectify Iraq is to look at Kurdistan. The British failed because they did not draw borders based on tribal sects they drew borders based on Empire and oil company dictates. You have to understand that the Arab World has been under Western/European invasion for thousands of years going back to "The Crusades". The USA picked up the mistakes the British made back during their Empire days just as we also picked up the failed policy of France in Vietnam. The American international and domestic failures have been due to disregard of the US Constitution and the intent of the Founding Fathers. Being a "World Police" and "Democracy Patrol" is just not what our Founding Fathers had in mind. Their rant was LESS government not MORE! They preferred "Liberty" over "Democracy" ... there is a difference.
Our logic to invade Afghanistan and Iraq is a mistake. Firstly because no "country" bombed the WTC ... eleven terrorists did, mostly from Saudi Arabia. In the same sense the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't conducted by a "country" it was one nutty guy, Tim McVeigh born in New York and a Roman Catholic. Does that mean we bomb New York and attack the Catholic religion. Add in all the other "faulty intel" and "lies" about Iraq. This was all orchestrated by Bin Laden to get America to do the same thing he got the Russians to do in the 1980s. Its the only strategy that works against SuperPowers ... We should know we did the same thing to the British in 1776! I guarantee you that as soon as we start pulling out of Iraq Bin Laden will set off another big bomb to get us mad again and keep us fighting and spending ourselves to death! Hey, his plan is working ... our first $1trillion war is here! At some point the Arabs get tired of being occupied by foreigners and they fight back. We would do the same if we were invaded for thousands of years. Its generational ... The same is happening in Latin America in terms of US intervention. The natives of Latin America have been under attack since the British and the Spaniards in the 1500s. I believe Chavez will fail simply because "socialism" fails. Leave him alone ... I lived in Venezuela during the 1960s when Bentencourt was in power, essentially a socio-democrat friendly to the US. He nationalized the foreign oil companies in 1960 so thats how long Venezuela has been "nationalizing"! Yet foreign companies ran operations, like Chevron, the company my Father worked for and established the Lake Maracaibo fields. He was a geophysicst and a VP of Explorations. We used to have the President of Chevron over for dinner. I was a small child then(three years old)and my Father said, "Bill(Pres)did not like to sit near you because you always threw milk at him!"
Even domestically Americans are worse off. Obviously Bush has low ratings because he has done poorly in most Americans view. As a "gambler" in the markets the failures are quite obvious. The SEC has failed and the FEDS have failed at the expense of "We The People", but Goldman Suchs keeps pumping out record profits. Yet Congress never brings them before the Senate like they do the oil company CEOs. Then there is the MAJOR issue of transparency ... in short ... there is NONE! Then what little data is available is useless like the CPI and the jobs reports. Of course M3 is a classic example of transparency issues. The constant weighting and re-weighting. Credibility is out the window!
Just where is the credibility of America? Do we have any left in our foreign policy? In capital markets? In politics? In the Judicial Branch? In banking? In health care? In human rights? In the military? In the Treasury/IRS? In immigration/borders? If the USA is a company then the US Dollar is our stock certificate. Our stock is falling because it is constantly being diluted(printed) and our earnings are negative while we are buried in debt. Do we deserve a AAA rating?
I believe the USA has many great attributes but our thinking and our actions have been annexed by the lure of "easy money". Our downfall has been our addiction to debt. Certainly healthy and prosperous economic futures cannot be built on such principles. Such is the curse of "World Reserve" currency status.
The British Empire's currency ... seems we are following in their shoes! The pound was once the World Reserve currency as well.
Link: http://www.nowandfutures.com/download/BritishPound1791-2004.png
Posted by: kaimu
at
March 17, 2007 2:38 PM [link]
Under the given climate it appears more and more important to have access to investing directly in foreign markets. For the little guy in Canada (who typically has a discount or full brokerage account) how can one go about getting access to foreign stock markets? I know you can use Pink Sheets or ADRs but if you don't have a lot of faith in the companies managing those efforts that doesn't seem to be the best vehicle. I know there are some small firms offering direct access to foreign markets - do those same options exist in Canada? Bill - I know you're a fellow Torontonian (at least when you're not languishing on a beach) - what advice do you have for people getting starting in branching out beyond North American borders?
Posted by: slindsay
at
March 17, 2007 2:40 PM [link]
Hi Bill,
With all due respect, I don't think mainstream anywhere pays too much attention to Donald Trump. The man may be successful and control large amounts of assets and capital but I think most see him as a media whore.
The same could be said for Chavez but I happen to like Chavez because he has balls.
The United States ascended to greatness through hard work and the dreams of honorable men. I am sorry to say it is now being destroyed by lazy, greedy pigs who wouldn't know hard work and social equity if it hit them upside the head.
cb
Posted by: cb
at
March 17, 2007 3:35 PM [link]
Gen Musharraf in Pakistan is going wobbly.
I give the Gen a 50-50 chance of survival.
This could be a really big deal for world stability.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6462745.stm
Kaimu as you well know this is not really Brit Empire 2.
Its the same Empire (1913) ruled by the same people.
My father worked for USAID and I was about 4
in Guatemala when Cardenas got the boot.
He was the Chavez of his day. United Fruit owned
half the arable land in Guatemala. Cardenas wanted
land reform...Bananas were more important to
the empire.
The Brit military in Iraq and Afghanistan again?
Now with the US military! LOL
This is the Great Game part deux.
Posted by: DollarBill
at
March 17, 2007 3:43 PM [link]
Yes there is always a danger in capital market (as you state) but Donald Trump & Chavez opinion aren't that important… Better stick to the charts…
This may be important. China tomorrow will again raise the one-year benchmark lending rate - to 6.39 percent from 6.12 percent.
The central bank is concerned that cash from a record trade surplus fuels excess investment, and may accelerate inflation and cause boom-and-bust cycles in asset prices. Premier Jiabao said the economic expansion is "unstable and environmentally unsustainable".
Let's see the effects on Sunday night.
Posted by: SiO2
at
March 17, 2007 4:18 PM [link]
Bill, in the USA we are in a state of shock and horror at the state of things, on both sides of the aisle. It is everywhere.
From a round table in Rolling Stone Magazine on leaving Iraq, that includes a retired general, read the last comment by the general.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13710030/leaving_iraq_the_grim_truth
Posted by: bbcmoney
at
March 17, 2007 5:26 PM [link]
real1,
Your tone offends me. This is my blog and I'll stick to whatever the hell I want to.
The point was not about Trump and Chavez but about the US media, of which Wolf Blitzer and Barbara Walters are leading anchors. The stories they pick and how they play them will determine the mind-set of Americans.
That's my point. If I didn't think it was valid, I wouldn't have wasted my time in writing it.
Posted by: Bill Cara
at
March 17, 2007 6:08 PM [link]
Another HBB Trick??
What is going on the the XLF (Financials index)?
Let's see, it trades on Friday at under $35 from 10:50 until 3:59, then in the last minute of trading jumps from $34.86 to $35.02 miraculously causing about 120,000 Put contracts to become worthless. None of the underlying securities (C, BAC, AIG, etc.) show a similar jump which would cause this - imagine that.
This seems like obvious market manipulation and, further to previous comments in this blog, I cannot believe that the SEC, etc. allows obvious manipulation and essentially stealing of money from the regular investors.
Signed,
an obviously disgruntled holder of XLF Mar 35 Puts!
Posted by: bb
at
March 17, 2007 6:31 PM [link]
NYUgrad,
I too have been keeping an eye on Starbucks. Many average investors have made good money on this one. It was a no brainer for a long time with many devout followers. A guy that works for me has a girlfriend that works at Starbucks. She told him that they design their coffee beans to produce higher strength caffine output. That concept will keep 'um coming in even in a recession. It is all about legal drugs here. Cramer says buy it when it gets to 27-28.
Posted by: stktrader
at
March 17, 2007 6:35 PM [link]
Hi all,
just a quick note on real-world inflation:
anyone tried to buy chicken wings lately? you know, the box from the stores, 908 g... Well I remember a couple years back I used to buy them quite often and pay $6.99-$8.99 depending on where I went. I just got home from the local Dominion where I paid $12.99 for a box!
mmmm, but they are going to be so good!
Happy St. Patty's Day!
Posted by: Eric
at
March 17, 2007 7:01 PM [link]
Bill thanks for your comments about too much negativity. Here’s my two cents. I’ve been thinking the same and although I think we will enter a recession, there will be opportunity. And we’ll work our way through it despite some pain. I know there are a lot of different opinions out there and I think that’s good. That’s what makes markets. Plays on the PMs and weakening dollar have been and are no-brainers as long as one knows when to exit. Your readers appreciate your insights into this.
Some of the following comes from information on Don Coxe’s view. The sub-prime fallout will affect the coastal areas more than the mid section of the U.S. where farmers are doing well and will do better, much better this year. Sure there will be sub-prime fallout in mid western cities, but I don’t think it will be as bad as a Florida, Arizona or California. A source recently told me Coxe said something like “sub-prime didn’t buy farmland and if it did, they’ll have enough money” (to make payments or pay-off after harvesting the corn and soybeans). Makes sense to me.
Corn last year was something like $1.65 a bushel, while this year is in excess of $4. The ethanol push has a lot to do with this. Although I don’t think it’s as beneficial as media hype portrays (I’ve read where it allegedly costs something like $1 of oil to produce $1.25 of ethanol; it’s difficult to transport long distances---no pipelines here), the politicians will be promoting corn ethanol more and more. The Iowa and Illinois primaries have been moved up to the start of primary elections. The politicians will visit and media will cover these states more than in the past as it seems the first primaries receive more publicity. I don’t see any politician visiting the Midwest and saying ethanol is not worth it.
In addition, Bush is on board. Although the president was aware Iran funds the Shia insurgency in Iraq, it now has dawned on him the Saudis (thru the Wahabi) fund Sunni insurgents. This obviously has convinced him we have to look for alternatives. So even Bush supports alternative fuels now as he has initiated government funding supporting ethanol initiatives.
So what does this mean? Opportunity with those things agriculture uses and needs.
Reference the postings on Chavez and Latin America:
For interesting insight into how the U.S. operates in Latin America as well as other places throughout the world and why some leaders perceive us in certain ways, I recommend Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins. It’s an insider’s true story of his career working as an American economic consultant and how his economic forecasts, with the IMF and government agencies like USAID and others, indebted foreign countries to the benefit of American companies and the U.S. You’ll recognize some of the players (HAL, among others) in today’s world.
Hope you’re resting and get well soon. Happy St. Patrick’s Day to all!
Posted by: Seamus
at
March 17, 2007 7:32 PM [link]
bb (Another HBB Trick?? ... an obviously disgruntled holder of XLF Mar 35 Puts!)
If XLF closed @ 34.86, the exchange would not automatically exercise a 35 put. Most small holders of a 35 put would choose not to exercise, in view of the transaction costs; if however you had some H (= humongous) holding, say 20,000 puts, it may well have been worth your while to exercise.
Posted by: Kaushik
at
March 17, 2007 7:35 PM [link]
Dear Bill:
Along with everyone else I wish you the most speedy and complete recovery which takes presidence over everything else.
The question I have and I know is troubling everyone else is that there is credible comment from many sources that the economy and the stock market will tank. That in such event gold will go up but all the gold stocks (and commodity stocks) will sink like lead baloons along with the rest.
Can you give me your opinion on this.
Being new to this site I do not know whether I would get your answer (if you gave one ) by a separate E-mail or I would have to watch the commentaries for an answer. Thank you for your understanding.
Posted by: Rodney
at
March 17, 2007 7:56 PM [link]
For those who haven't seen the Donald interview on CNN, such as myself, you can watch it here:
http://tinyurl.com/3c3gz4
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
March 17, 2007 9:10 PM [link]
FED PUMPED $57 BILLION INTO THE MARKET
Looks like our government is preempting a major market collapse by pumping them up...please read the following and comment.
http://www.etfdigest.com/daveDaily.php
I shutter to think how bad things would have been
without this intervention. Now if our government is willing to do that, what is stopping them from fudging PPI/CPI/etc.. for a "softer, gentler landing"?
Posted by: onlineaces
at
March 17, 2007 9:15 PM [link]
It might be a coincidence that Barbara Walters and Donald Trump are blustering their feathers at the same time. Of course it’s all about them, and them only, not about Chavez or the horrible state of this administration. I don’t think they really care. It’s just cheap entertainment.
But the big issue is the immense lack of trust and confidence in the USA. Bill is right to bring up this issue: When most of the world laughs about the Bush administration, and opportunists like Trump and Walters begin the jump in, then everybody should be concerned. That Bush and his incompetent crew are not willing or able to change course, is obvious.
The problem is, that they destroy more then their own reputation. They really do damage to the whole country, the economy and the markets. When you talk to venture capitalists, bankers and managers and you see and feel their deep frustration about the lack of leadership in Washington, then you begin to realize that it will need a lot of time and diplomatic skill to fix that problem. I think that the Bush years will be remembered as eight lost years. As long as we don’t see how this crisis will be solved I expect unstable markets, but also more and more buying opportunities. Patience will pay.
Posted by: tinman
at
March 17, 2007 9:27 PM [link]
I agree with you Bill that Americans will turn on themselves and lose confidence in their future. The same thing happened in the 70's. Part of the reason Star Wars was such huge hit was because it was the first movie at the time to offer hope in the future and belief in the good will defeat evil (US v. USSR).
One of the most important things I've learned as an investor is to manage my own emotions and stick to my discipline. I'm still not great at it but I am learning. Also important is to learn economic history and realize that the markets go through cycles of over-valuation and under-valuation. Once you learn these things it becomes easier to put what is happening in our current time into context. You are right - Americans are losing confidence in ourselves and our institutions. However, aware investors will recognize that this will present remarkable opportunities to buy quality companies and bonds as the masses succumb to despair and sell at the bottom.
The psychology of investors: optimism -> excitement -> euphoria -> anxiety -> denial -> fear -> desperation -> panic -> capitulation -> despondency -> depression -> hope -> relief -> optimism
Posted by: moab
at
March 17, 2007 9:28 PM [link]
Posted by: number2son at March 17, 2007 1:43 PM
"And please pardon my poor early morning grammar."
My dear number2son,
What time does the sun rise in your county?
Posted by: Seamus
at
March 17, 2007 9:39 PM [link]
One more point: I don't think I have ever seen as many horror movies produced. You see marquee stars in them now. That tells me these films are making serious money and American society as a whole is feeling anxiety and fear. A historical parallel: many classic horror movies were produced in 1931 and 1932.
Posted by: moab
at
March 17, 2007 9:48 PM [link]
And before i forget, here is the Chavez 20/20 interview.
http://tinyurl.com/24hnuc
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
March 17, 2007 9:53 PM [link]
I must be living in another America (USA). Here in San Diego, CA., one of two counties in the USA that the real estate community says has had the biggest drop in home prices, things are so good that I cannot find anyone to answer a help wanted ad to aquire a job that pays $15/hour to start with up to $25/hr in two years. Last year it would have been no problem getting calls. One is not in a recession unless you cannot find a job. Everyone that wants a job has one. I just don't see the doom and gloom. The market is unstable right now because of sub prime issues that we all hear about. The majority of homeowners have stable mortgages. When this issue clears, stocks will continue to rise and gold will fall.
Posted by: stktrader
at
March 17, 2007 10:12 PM [link]
http://www.investinginbonds.com/
Here's a site that Bill's reader might enjoy--either for information or soporific effects!
Nomura does some economic briefings. I think that I might have posted here previously about the site. My memory does not serve so well sometimes.
Posted by: RonK
at
March 17, 2007 11:38 PM [link]
A lighter note re SBUX..... While at Starbucks last week I was served a sample brew in a mini-sized paper cup with the logo on it, about 1/3rd the size of a small cup. After trying the sample I kept the cup and returned to the office and re-filled the cup before entering my meeting in the board room. Putting my cup on the table, I enthusiastically announced that Starbucks were now going head to head with Tim Hortons on price - I got a $1 cup of coffee at Starbucks! Everyone believed me.
Posted by: TerryC
at
March 17, 2007 11:39 PM [link]
Tonight I watched "Two for the Money" and couldn't help feel the parallels between sports betting (gambling), the role of the 'tout', and today's investment climate. Definitely something that all investors should watch, while contemplating risk management.
Bill you are one of the few Financial blogs I read, I didn't mean to dictate what you should stick to , just a suggestion…. As I already said before : the Info / data on the net is dwarfing the TV this is a trend IMO… TV lags the net big time, Especially Blogs…
all totaled, it looks like the Fed pumped in $76 bln during the past week:
http://buttonwood1792.blogspot.com/2007/03/pushing-on-string-new-york-fed.html
that's not chump change.
Kaimu, if you care to, please contact me at jimkingsland@gmail.com. Your post was tremendously insightful and I have a few questions for you. -jimk
Posted by: Jim Kingsland
at
March 18, 2007 12:53 AM [link]
Jim I was about to cut/paste your post from last Friday per the NY Fed. injection here (i.e. "Pushing on a String"). My purpose was to correct some here that had-it in the fifties. To piggy-back on your fine article, I leave you with this from John Hussman:
The “liquidity” trap
I'm similarly convinced that Wall Street has no idea what it's talking about when it uses the word “liquidity.” While using the phrase “global liquidity” lends a further element of worldly sophistication, Wall Street still hasn't the slightest idea what it's talking about. The phenomenon that's being called “liquidity” is nothing more than a combination of fiscal irresponsibility and risk blindness, and will ultimately prove itself to be the time-bomb that it is when investors begin to “re-price” that risk.
Let's go back to basics. If the economy produces output valued at $100, we can classify that $100 as either consumption or investment. Let's say that $80 represents “consumption.” We define “savings” as the portion of output that wasn't consumed ($100-$80), which is $20. Not surprisingly, that's exactly the value of the stuff we classified as “investment.” It's an accounting identity that saving always equals investment (always – if the investment goods weren't sold, the income wasn't generated, and the saving didn't happen).
If we look at individual actors in the economy, it will generally be true that some of them want to save part of what they have, and some of them want to invest more than they have. So we need a way for savers to transfer their income to the people who want to use those savings. This is done by issuing securities. Money is transferred from the saver to the spender, and the spender issues a receipt which offers some hope of repayment in the future.
Here is the crucial point. Once a security is issued, that piece of paper thereafter represents savings that have already been deployed in order to purchase investment goods and services (factories, equipment, housing, computers, and so forth).
The security is simply a receipt. It means that at some point in the past, someone produced goods and services without consuming them, and someone consumed or invested in goods and services without producing them. That change of ownership was accomplished by issuing that stock, or bond, or IOU. Again, it represents money that has already been spent – goods and services that have already been deployed.
Now consider government and foreign trade. The U.S. is currently running massive federal deficits, and massive current account deficits. What's really happening here is that we are, in aggregate, consuming more than we produce, and foreigners are producing more than they consume. This difference requires the issuance of a huge volume of new securities to enact that transfer of purchasing power. The resulting mountain of issued securities does not represent newly created money looking for a home, or looking to be spent. It has already been spent! And we've spent it.
Specifically, the U.S. has issued huge volumes of Treasury securities that have been purchased, largely, by China and Japan . There's your global liquidity. It's a monstrous stock of Treasury debt that represents the claims of foreigners on our future production. That's in addition, of course, to the enormous inter-generational claims that we've promised via Social Security and Medicaid, which place further burdens on our future production.
So yes, enormous volumes of securities, primarily U.S. Treasuries and mortgage securities, have been issued in recent years. Foreigners hold a staggering quantity of the Treasury securities. Our own financial system holds direct and indirect claims on a lot of the toxic stuff like mortgage debt. Wall Street talks about all of this using the upbeat term “liquidity.” But what it really represents is a crushing pile of claims on our future production, as well as high risk junk, some of which (like sub-prime mortgage debt) is already starting to go belly-up. This is not money “looking for a home.” It is a pile of IOU's for money that has already been spent.
To understand the importance of this to the “money on the sidelines” mirage and the “liquidity sloshing around looking for a home” fallacy, notice that as the U.S. issues more Treasury debt, that debt simply must be held by someone. It is clear, then, that we must by necessity observe a rising stock of apparent “money on the sidelines” in the form of Treasuries on the balance sheets of foreign central banks, U.S. corporations, and individual investors. There is no other way. Again, these securities represent spending that our government has already done. It is not wealth (at least, not to the U.S. ) but a claim on future production. Nor it is money that “has to find a home.” It has already arrived, moved in, and in many cases, trashed the place. If somebody sells these bonds to buy stocks, somebody else has to buy the bonds and sell the stocks. In aggregate, no money goes into or out of either stocks or bonds by virtue of such transactions.
With regard to the “yen carry trade,” want to know who is the largest investor in that trade? Simple: the nation of Japan. It is the Japanese themselves who are most active in selling yen, buying dollars, and investing in U.S. Treasuries at higher yields. Japan has done this, as China has with its currency, in order to support the value of the U.S. dollar. But as their ownership of Treasury securities has grown, the potential cost of any realignment of exchange rates is becoming dangerously high, so both countries are beginning to diversify their central bank assets into other currencies such as the euro. Accumulating U.S. securities may have been fun while it lasted, but China and Japan are beginning to realize that the U.S. government has no plans to restrain its fiscal irresponsibility (largely because it lacks the capacity for constructive diplomacy).
This will end badly. “Global liquidity” is not a positive for U.S. markets. It is simply evidence of the existing claims of other nations against our future prosperity. There will be an increasing amount of apparent “money on the sidelines” in the years ahead, for the simple reason that the U.S. government will keep issuing securities and somebody will have to hold them.
Posted by: Rick45
at
March 18, 2007 10:02 AM [link]
* Money Center Bank action a huge bear flag (if you bought on last Weds. "dip") best be very nimble.
* Big Cap Tech holding-up well considering how overpirced these stocks are.
* Now that D.J. Trans. Index, would like to see volume but my guess is similar to overall indices (dried-up from 1/1/07-2/27/07). However to throw a bone to the bulls, uptrend line is holding at first blush that chart has BUY written all over it!
Posted by: Rick45
at
March 18, 2007 10:18 AM [link]
I've been doing a fair amount of poking around of late regarding all of this securitized debt. This is what my pea-brained understanding of it all is:
There has been huge amounts of money looking for yield.
Smarty-pants investment bankers through securitized debt obligations have eliminated risk from the traditional holders (who cared very deeply if things went south) and have moved it back into the food chain to investors--people who bought these bonds. Now the traditional originators have this stupendous bonanza of fee income from originating and servicing the loans, no matter how specious the underlying collateral or credit worthiness of the borrower.
I think that the sub-prime issue is merely the first corner in which the light is beginning to shine. Investors would do well to look at their bond funds and find out what the composition of those funds are. I truly believe that we are seeing just the tip of this iceberg. And the dark waters surrounding all of this are both cold and dangerous. I hope that I am wrong.
RE: San Diego housing,,,,Check out this piece for Ca. dealing with mortgage forclosures
Posted by: dabonenose
at
March 18, 2007 11:07 AM [link]
"What time does the sun rise in your county?"
Touché, Seamus. Would you believe I got an early start on St. Pat's day and sufferred its predictable after effects?
Posted by: number2son
at
March 18, 2007 11:29 AM [link]
Bill,
I watched the Donald Trump interview and agreed with him to my surprise(he is not on my most favoured people list) With Chavez I have mixed feelings; basically it comes down to the question of how much his ego will get in the way of his stated intent and how it will influence his decision making, especially in foreign policy. So far, it is a mixed bag. But beyond my own conflicted feelings I came away from it very diturbed.
Your "view from above" perspective was refreshing to say the least. Thanks again for sharing your independent gaze into current events. I wish you the best of health.
Best regards,
Athan
Posted by: yaba
at
March 18, 2007 11:39 AM [link]
Dabo,
Thanks for the link. 3100 homes in foreclosure in San Diego county. If you know the size of this county, one would not see that number as being very large. San Diego is hugh. Since we have a very large low income population it would not surprise me if the sub prime market is also quite large. Those 3100 homes could also be in the process of debt counceling which would take them off the list. I still say that the traditional mortgage holder is not a problem due to the strong job market. The sub primes got increases in their mortgage payments every few months to create the problems in that space. This issue will get purged and things will move ahead as normal.
Posted by: stktrader
at
March 18, 2007 12:33 PM [link]
How price elastic is the sub prime market? Financial institutions are generally adept at transferring risk to their customers. Insurance companies increase premiums to compensate for additional risk and credit card companies charge astronomical rates to offload risk. If sub prime lending is experiencing an increasing rate of defaults, won't lenders increase sub prime interest rates. I think that borrowers probably fall into two camps, dwellers and speculator/flippers. The speculators can walk away and stay away but, the dwellers will borrow at any price that they think they can carry. From the bankers perspective, more defaults isn't necessarily a bad thing if they can increase their revenue and income.
Posted by: lovesaves
at
March 18, 2007 1:03 PM [link]
stktrader,
I must say that that your last comment mirrors those of a close family member who lives in aliso viejo: things will move ahead as normal. given that new century is/was based in irvine, the issue hits closer to home than many would like to believe. i think the problem is that most American people just don't want to deal with it or hear it. Perhaps because their lives thus far have been relatively unaffected. in california, the sun shines everyday which creates a sense of euphoria. it's absolutely beautiful (i want to move there in a few years, hopefully prices will be depressed by then!). i also wonder what the repercussions will be for people that actually do have jobs that can support there mortgage, and are not in over their heads with debt. are the strong, strong enough to carry the weak?
why can't we have california's weather here in Canada?
Posted by: Eric
at
March 18, 2007 1:05 PM [link]
Here's an article from the SF Chronicle which notes both the strong job market stktrader pointed out, and the potential fall-out from subprime defaults that Leisa alluded to:
"No credit, no savings -- no problem!"
That could be the motto for the subprime lending industry. And that simple slogan might just end up knocking the props out from under the U.S. economy.
Until a few months ago, someone with tarnished credit and meager assets could find dozens of lenders offering a no-money-down, interest-only mortgage for several hundred thousand dollars. To sweeten the pot, many such loans were "no doc" -- meaning potential borrowers could simply state their income instead of producing documents such as pay stubs to verify it. In the trade, they call these "liar loans."
Subprime loans to people with poor credit have ballooned to $1.3 trillion, accounting for a fifth of all new mortgages last year.
And that's turning into a major threat to the economy.
The subprime industry has begun to implode as many credit-challenged borrowers fall behind. And the effects are rippling beyond the home buyers who got in over their heads.
Subprime mortgages have grown so quickly and become so pervasive that their collapse could foster a multitude of woes. Subprime defaults could wallop Wall Street institutions with huge losses, further undermine the already-soft housing market and drag down consumer spending.
In a worst-case scenario, the turmoil could trigger a recession the way the savings-and-loan scandal did nearly two decades ago.
Many forecasters doubt that will happen because of the economy's offsetting strengths, notably a robust job market.
Still, anxiety over subprime loans is mounting among economists, Wall Street traders, banking regulators and government officials.
Congress is looking at ways to shore up the industry. Fear about subprime loans was a major catalyst for the stock market swoon this month.
Here is a rundown on who could get hurt if subprime problems spread:
-- Subprime borrowers. First up are the folks who took out mortgages they couldn't afford, seduced by a hot housing market. While prices were rising, many borrowers saw their homes increase in value. That masked the problem because they could refinance based on that increased equity. Or they could sell their homes for a profit or at least enough to pay off the mortgage.
But now that housing prices are stagnating, the options of refinancing or selling have slammed shut. People who bought homes they couldn't afford face the prospect of losing them through foreclosure, forfeiting their down payments and having their credit ruined. The Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group, predicts that 2.2 million subprime borrowers will wind up in foreclosure in the next few years.
-- Speculators. Real-estate buyers who rushed into markets such as Las Vegas and Phoenix to snap up homes, hoping to "flip" them for quick profits, could lose big.
-- Subprime lenders. Companies that make subprime loans are already disintegrating because of delinquent and defaulting borrowers. In the past three months, 35 subprime mortgage companies have gone out of business. Of the 25 biggest, about half are out of business or so severely impaired that they are not making any new loans, according to Chris Low, chief economist at FTN Financial in New York, a capital markets arm of prime mortgage lender First Horizon National Bank.
Subprime lenders are in the business of originating loans, not holding them for the long term.
Typically, they "securitize" the mortgages, that is, bundle them up and sell them to investors. That brings in new cash so they can make more loans.
But most securitization deals include a clause saying if the loan goes bad in the first three months, the originating mortgage company has to buy it back, Low noted. So many loans have gone bad that subprime lenders have been unable to keep up.
The lenders rely on lines of credit from investors who buy mortgages to finance their operations. But those buyers have stopped buying and subprime lenders are seeing their credit dry up.
-- Wall Street firms and other big institutions that bought the loans. Subprime mortgages get packaged, sliced and diced to create a range of products with different levels of risk. Such mortgage-backed securities have become popular investment vehicles in recent years. Subprime loans carry interest rates two to five percentage points higher than those to borrowers with good credit, so theoretically they offer a high enough return to offset the risks.
"They are bought broadly," said Steve Cochrane, senior economist at Moody's Economy.com, a forecasting service in Pennsylvania. "Many are held by investment banks, hedge funds, international investors of many sorts."
The big question is exactly who holds them.
"Part of the panic the other day when the stock market was tumbling was trying to figure out who's on the hook for these bonds," Low said.
In the coming weeks, some victims of spending sprees in subprime mortgage securities will be revealed as Wall Street firms report financial results.
If major Wall Street firms have to write off billions of dollars in investments, that could further chill the stock market and have repercussions throughout the financial sector.
-- Other borrowers. Financial institutions might react to the subprime implosion by clamping down on other kinds of borrowing. If money is harder to get, the economy suffers because it's harder for businesses to expand and consumers to spend.
"It could create a fair amount of uncertainty in investment markets, so that all investors would become overly cautious and freeze up, stop trading," Cochrane said. "That could limit the flow of capital in the U.S. economy and the global economy, and create a credit crunch."
Cochrane says he thinks there is about a 25 percent chance that could happen. The results would be far-reaching.
"Right now you might say there's a bit of a credit squeeze, largely focused on subprime holders. If the lending industry stopped lending or became increasingly tight on prime mortgages, commercial loans, industrial loans, revolving credit, it could very quickly work to slow the economy down and push it into recession," he said.
-- The housing market. The subprime collapse threatens to turn the real estate slowdown into a meltdown. Lenders have started to tighten their standards, meaning that fewer buyers -- both prime and subprime -- qualify for loans. That lessens demand and increases inventory.
With subprime buyers no longer in the picture, "There are a lot fewer people out there competing to buy homes, on top of which, because foreclosures are so high, there is a steady stream of houses hitting the market," Low said.
"It means the supply-demand imbalance remains for another couple of years, putting downward pressure on prices."
-- Consumer spending. The stimulus from rising real estate prices has been one of the main engines of the economy in the past few years, as people bought and furnished new homes, and borrowed against existing homes for big-ticket purchases such as remodels and cars.
If homes are worth less, people find it harder to sell them and harder to borrow against them. That means consumers will tighten theirs belt and the whole economy will take a hit.
E-mail Carolyn Said at csaid@sfchronicle.com.
This article appeared on page D - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
March 18, 2007 1:07 PM [link]
Bill,
Regarding your comments on the large miners and their ability to squeeze the shorts, spent some time with a longtime geologist at PDAC and his comment was that Inco and Falconbridge now in the hands of the big players, the market was well enough controlled that you should see an ongoing higher price for Nickel. He said a lot of the recent upward movement in prices was caused by supply restraint, not high demand.
He said to look at what happenned to Iron Ore pricing back in 2003 - 2005 after a similar consolidation in this mineral occurred and the big miners "imposed" a 70% increase of the price of iron ore to China.
I wonder if we are entering an era where the cost of finding and developing new resources becomes so high that it enables the market to form cartel-like structures around these markets to drive higher long-term prices. People generally belive that it is difficult to have cartels in commodities due to the fact that as prices rise, other producers will come on quickly, but with the lack of easily findable minerals, difficulty in getting people and equipment and especially new environmental rules, I don't think you will see the supply response you've seen in the past.
If you want more details, see "What Determines Cartel Success" by Margaret C. Levenstein http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=299415 and you'll see a lot of the conditions are in place for these miner to exert cartel-like control in the market.
Posted by: bb
at
March 18, 2007 1:09 PM [link]
2nd ave. allow me to speak to san diego and other parts of california noting i am a native and currently own rental property downtown (e.g. my parents met/married in san diego in the fifties while they were working at Ryan Aeronautical, T.Claude Ryan is credited by the way for developing the first commercial airline service in the U.S. in 1925 SD/LA in addition to Spirit of St. Louis fame a few years later God do we need a hero like Lucky Lindy again or what?). Granted some zip codes here (e.g. north S.D. county, parts of the bay area like marin county, contra costa, Silicon Valley north where my Dad bought in early sixties when coming to Stanford to teach), will not feel much of the effects noting they are on the "right side of the tracks." However J6P has not been able to buy in these areas for over 2 decades now (explains in-part why the highest foreclosure rates are in the central valley where Joe-6 and fam. packed-up to for "affordable housing" and lower property taxes post Proposition 13 back in the day late '70s+). My sources in the San Diego loan/title biz report business is down by roughly half year over year (e.g. one good friend of mine was layed-off last Thursday she is writing one deal a month compared to 6 a month last year). Russ Winter's coverage/numbers in this regard is top-flight!
Posted by: Rick45
at
March 18, 2007 1:35 PM [link]
Interestingly, my yahoo spam filter still as of today catches 2 or 3 message per day offering mortgages of the "no credit, no problem type". It looks like some companies have not tightened things up yet.
Also, last year Citibank gave me $20K on a new Mastercard CC at 0% rate. To my surprise it was indeed 0%, thank you very much (got the card and made no other purchase at all). Now I wonder if the money came from those weekly Billions the Fed gives.
Posted by: SiO2
at
March 18, 2007 2:02 PM [link]
Rick45,
I agree with you. Prices in San Mateo county are in fact still on the rise, although now the %s are in single digits (in addition to the reason you mentioned, another would be no room left for development on the Peninsula). And my younger brother is in the process of moving back to La Jolla, where he has been hoping for more of a decline than he's seeing. (My Dad spent a few years in the sixties at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park [which I don't think is related to the school], and his biggest regret is selling a home in Atherton in 1970 for $50K!).
What concerns me are the implications of the "affordability gap," none of which can be good. Without affordable housing, how do you recruit good people?
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
March 18, 2007 2:13 PM [link]
What I will find interesting and I have thought about this for well over a year or two is what happens to the self employed who bought their home with good credit and a no documentation loan. Prime loans that will now in the future need documentation with two years or three years of Schedule C profit and loss. Considering how many hide income and report modest incomes, how will they qualify for the new fixed ARM that they will be aquiring when their current 3-5 year ARM expires, adding to the fact that they will need to borrow more to cover their lines of credit? That is one reason that I have never had a problem reporting tax documents for new loans. I don't hide income. Although my broker at Wells Fargo always preferred the no doc method. My current loan is good for another three years at 4 5/8% on a jumbo.
Posted by: stktrader
at
March 18, 2007 2:28 PM [link]
Wow, Bill, thanks again. Incredibly informative.
EJ
Posted by: EJStockman
at
March 18, 2007 3:35 PM [link]
Bill, WIR takes me a while to plow thru..I keep thinking of the work that you offer to us .THANKS!
I, too, am interested in the miners. XME and XLB have risen to the top of my relative strength list that uses alpha periods as risk adjusted roc.
Questions: What's the risk that faces the miners in a downturn of the market? Will we get the same impact southward as a few weeks ago for both PM and the miners? Or, was that just a more isolated event of folks having to raise money? Another question: Can you assist in how we focus on the miners i.e, which ones? FWIW, last week I took positions in gdf and slw.
I applaud big time your wisdom about over reacting with negativity can blind us from opportunity. As a new reader I was becoming worried about this and did post here about this more than once. I'm narrowing down the blogs that I will allow to become a source of influence. Your comments this week seal my wish to keep learning and follow your pragmatic advice.
My .02 worth, for me, here, it's not about political currents per se, it's about my financial health. I'm impressed with the prolific writings of fellow posters as political scientists. History and such fascinate me. I might add that my great uncle was apart of the revolution in central america that set the stage for United Fruit. The theme of the ugly american has never stopped. With over 300 military bases through out the world, it's a cinch to be that way. BUT, I personally need to stay focused as an investor. Over stimulation is not good.
Posted by: jasper
at
March 18, 2007 4:46 PM [link]
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$CPC&p=D&yr=
3&mn=0&dy=0&id=p32648485596
Great sentiment indicator, put call ratio historic high since 1995. Carving out a bottom or signaling that these highs can no longer be a contrairian predictor?
Posted by: jasper
at
March 18, 2007 4:49 PM [link]
2nd ave you are correct SRI is private and not affiliated with the Univ., I use to ride my bike by it when attending Menlo-Atherton H.S. My father and I would have this debate often (i.e. qualtiy of life here in the counbtry superior to city life and at a discount to prices that folks like Apple help maintain with housing stipends, etc...). Even school districts had to get into the act noting cost of living by offering VERY low interest rate mortgages to teachers. I grew-up next door to Atherton on Santa Cruz avenue near Hillview school and frankly remember at an early age coming in contact with super-wealth (e.g. elevators in mansions, building the exploding volcano for 6th grade science class with mate J. Pritzker, etc...). I like to say I was the first latch key child and the last middle-class one....Noticed the hood became quite gentrified since I left for school down in the valley and beyond (e.g. this blog where I am but a "gopher" and student).
$ 50,000 in 1970 huh, ooops!
Here is one that speaks to currency debasement and bubbles down in "u must be kidding-me'ville," I am the executor and trustee of my father's estate (he passed away at 90 last Sept., I'm 44 and his only child). He has a very small interest in a large appt. complex (i.e. 92 units) in Palo Alto near 101 that will pass escrow soon. He established the position in 1989 for $ 10,000. Take a guess, is that equity now worth above or below $ 500,000?
I AM EVEN OLD ENUF TO REMEMBER WHEN THAT WAS ALOT OF MONEY!
Posted by: Rick45
at
March 18, 2007 5:57 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
It is amazing to me that all I ever hear about from TV talking heads and posters here is the "demand" side of commodities. I have tried to post here prior about the "supply" side. In just a short phrase you can describe the global supply of base metals and PM ... "There isn't any!" South Africa just reported gold production is at the lowest level since 1922. I posted charts of the LME warehouse stocks showing some very important metals like zinc, nickel, copper and lead at historic lows, even some just barely above "zero" as I type!
The only slow down in economies that will effect "supplies" is a MAJOR BIRD FLU where half the Worlds population is wiped out! Do you think just because you lose your job you quit consuming commodities? Do you think just because we are in a recession or depression that the US government does not print money any more? Here is a chart of US government debt since 1969. Where is the part of this chart that shows the US government stopped going into debt? The market crashed in 1987 but money didn't!
Link: http://www.nowandfutures.com/download/debt_fed_govt1970-2005.png
If anything recessions and depressions cause the US government and FED to print even more money! Remember what you are experiencing in your life is not the cost of houses and gas going up but the value of your money going down!
Someone explain to me how base metal and PM prices can go down significantly when supply is at 5-20 year lows? Bill and company just reported that PDAC is crying out for "drills and qualified personnel" ... That does not sound like an industry in decline. That sounds like an industry in desperate need for production. You cannot analyze economic/market futures by just analyzing the "demand" side!
Yet even demand is still high. China just reported a 70% increase of commodity imports for February compared to the prior month January 2007. The Shanghai Metal Index has not budged even during stock market crashes and is still near its high of 36,000.
All these signals on the "supply side" telegraph a global scarcity as global populations rise dramatically and global militaries expand at an equally rapid rate. Even the US military has been importing "bullets". Last I looked 9mm rounds are made of metal. Don't be fooled by what the DOW does each week ... The last place Wall Street wants your money to go is commodities! They will manipulate and spin ad infinitum to keep cash pouring into the usual suspects ... in one word "paper"! Paper is unlimited and can be created out of thin air ... COMMODITIES CANNOT!
Posted by: kaimu
at
March 18, 2007 6:47 PM [link]
Bill, should you care to, you might include the Pro-shares Ultra short ETF's for those that want to short but may not have a margin acct.
These are ultra-short etf's.
You can buy like regular stock and if the individual index craps out the stock should go up.
Good luck if interested.
QID tracs the QQQQ
SDS tracs the S&P 500
MZZ tracs the Midcap 400
DXD tracs the DOW 30
Here is link to all Pro-funds etf's
Posted by: dabonenose
at
March 18, 2007 7:14 PM [link]
dabanenose,
Just a clarification on your list of short ETFs: PSQ will return the inverse of the S&P 500, whereas SDS will return 2x the inverse of the S&P 500.
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
March 18, 2007 7:53 PM [link]
2nd ave,,,yes, I posted Ultra short. I shoulda said 2X=Ultra.
tkx,
Dab
Posted by: dabonenose
at
March 18, 2007 8:14 PM [link]
Rick45,
I attended Encinal Elementary followed by a couple of years at Menlo-Atherton (a few years ahead of you) before moving to Ann Arbor. It was a great place to grow up. Do you remember playing basketball at Burgess Gym (still there), or hanging out at Kepler's when it on the other side of El Camino?
I think offering low-rate mortgages to teachers is a good idea. Personally, I prefer to see everyone involved in the local economy comfortably living within the community. That's where the sense of community comes from. Isn't that one reason law enforcement personnel are required to reside within city limits (assuming that's still true)?
Posted by: 2nd_ave
at
March 18, 2007 8:25 PM [link]
ALOHA !!
Regarding Menlo/Atherton ... My electrical contracting company(I was a 50% partner)built the first VoiP protocol system with Cisco Systems back in 2000 installed at Menlo College. Nice small campus and believe it or not prior to this VoiP all they had was dial-up in a lot of buildings and were losing enrollment due to their antiquated internet connectivity. Hard to believe we were in a college located in the "Silicone Valley". One of the job hazards at the time was dodging Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley analysts aking questions slowing down our crew. Another crew hazard was the girls dorm! We used to love projects like this because the "change orders" were more than double the contracts! Even the project managers and inspectors were lost in "black box land" so we mainly built the project working directly with Cisco IT designers and techs. Everybody else was ... "Let us know when its working!"
The entire Menlo area was about monied families ... Rich kids were in abundance! I recall seeing a two-bedroom "bungalow" on the market then for $1.6mil and it sold two days later for $2.4mil after a bidding frenzy! The realtor told me the guy that bought the place never even did a walk-thru and was bidding from Miami, FL. HEADY DAYS !!! One can only imagine the real estate brokers commissions!!! I wonder what that same two bedroom "bungalow" will sell for in 2008? Somehow "bungalow" was an attribute ... I guess its better than calling it a "shack", which is what it was! HA !!
Posted by: kaimu
at
March 18, 2007 9:15 PM [link]
Bill, best wishes for a speedy recovery and take care of yourself! As my avuncular pediatrician would tell me - stop bounding around until you get well! I am a first time poster and want to take the opportunity to thank you for the insightful work you do here. I do not like the Donald, however neither do I like Mr. Bush. Don - if one must do a reprisal of Diamond Jim, then at least spare us in the peanut gallery the stentorian moral windbaggery. Mr. Bush - if Johnson gave us 'guns and butter' and a ten year bear market that Volker fixed with 18% prime, why do you insist on Johnsoning us again?
Agree about your oil observation. The tape on the Nymex April crude contract looked about as uncontrived as Mr. Bush during a news conference. Down fiveteen minutes, then up a buck for lunch then down again for supper. That's just Wednesday when DOE released numbers. Spooky. In the words of Bob Dylan 'something is happening here and you don't know what it is..' Well none of us know what it is, however someone is sending those sell orders from somewhere with some enormous confidence in their ability to deliver the physical product.. and that someone does know.
Posted by: calvino
at
March 19, 2007 2:10 AM [link]
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



































Thoughts on sbux anyone?
Technicals on Billcara2.com
http://tinyurl.com/ywx8ql
Nowhere near accumulation. But the institutions seem to have their "Starbucks" aprons over their brooks brothers suits lately.
My only worry is in recession times will consumers still pay $4 for a latte?
Posted by: NYUgrad
at
March 17, 2007 11:56 AM [link]